Foreign power hacking is a non-issue, because everyone agrees it is bad and should be stopped.
The only points of disagreement are the ones that follow, and none involve siding with a foreign power:
1) Should voters have relied upon leaked information when they made their voting decisions? You think they shouldn't have. I think it is ok for them to use that information, even though the information was initially obtained illegally. The remedy is not to undermine the voters choices, but to pursue the original perpetrators. The Democrats want to do the former (undermine the election) instead of the latter (pursue the perpetrators). I would say that your side is being unpatriotic and treasonous in the name of partisanship.
2) Is it ok for the press and the Democrats to secretly collude?...without telling the voters...pretending that neutrality exists where in fact there is only pure partisanship? You think it is ok. I think it isn't.
3) Is it ok for the press and Democrats to use unofficial, leaked information from unnamed source inside our own intelligence agencies to challenge the validity of the election? I think no; you have no problem with our own intelligence agency personnel undermining our election. Who is being patriotic here? I would say that the Democrats certainly are not.
It is far worse for members of our intelligence committee to release disinformation to undermine our elections than for a foreign power to release accurate information to merely influence our election.