Menu
UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting
Football
2023 Notre Dame Football Schedule
2023 Notre Dame Roster
2022 Notre Dame Coaching Staff
Injury News & Updates
Notre Dame Football Depth Charts
Notre Dame Point Spreads & Betting Odds
Notre Dame Transfers
NFL Fighting Irish
Game Archive
Player Archive
Past Seasons & Results
Recruiting
Commits
News & Rumors
Class of 2018 Commit List
Class of 2019 Commit List
Class of 2020 Commit List
Class of 2021 Commit List
Archives
History
Notre Dame Bowl History
Notre Dame NFL Draft History
Notre Dame Football ESPN GameDay History
Notre Dame Heisman Trophy Winners
Notre Dame Football National Championships
Notre Dame Football Rivalries
Notre Dame Stadium
Touchdown Jesus
Basketball
Forums
Chat Room
Football Forum
Open Forum
Basketball Board
Ticket Exchange
Videos
Notre Dame Basketball Highlights
Notre Dame Football Highlights
Notre Dame Football Recruiting Highlights
Notre Dame Player Highlights
Hype Videos
Latest News
Gear
About
Advertise With Us
Contact Us
Our RSS Feeds
Community Rules
Privacy Policy
RSS
YouTube
Twitter
Facebook
Home
>
Forums
>
The Open Forum
Login
|
Register
Username
Password
Remember me
Sign in
And, no one would know about Clinton's e-mails, since the NYT broke that story.
Author:
Chris94
(35426 Posts - Original UHND Member)
Posted at 2:13 pm on Dec 15, 2016
View All
Does not compute! Does not compute!
Replies to: "And, no one would know about Clinton's e-mails, since the NYT broke that story."
Putin is a convenient distraction from the DNC fixing the primaries and colluding with the media -
-
BaronVonZemo
- 1:00pm 12/15/16
(47)
[View All]
You are siding with a foreign power over our own intel services
-
Chris94
- 1:07pm 12/15/16
Let's be clear, I don't trust the Obama appointed heads making ill-defined statements - and I point
-
BaronVonZemo
- 5:22pm 12/15/16
Seriously, do you even read the shit you post about? The October statement clearly states that.....
-
Frank L
- 5:57pm 12/15/16
Never mind that guys like Clapper were former Bush appointments.
[NT]
-
ND_in_DRO
- 5:38pm 12/15/16
No, Clapper started under Clinton & was in apolitical roles under Bush. He lied to congress in 2013
[
LINK
]
-
BaronVonZemo
- 5:54pm 12/15/16
How about the Pesky fact that Clapper was a political appointment by Bush?
[
LINK
]
-
ND_in_DRO
- 6:46pm 12/15/16
Doesn't matter as it doesn't suit the script.
[NT]
-
Frank L
- 8:16pm 12/15/16
yep, because
-
Hank the Tank
- 3:32pm 12/15/16
Your perfectly wrong streak continues. How did you make out in the soils course?
-
Frank L
- 3:38pm 12/15/16
How are you so sure about that?
-
Iggle
- 1:47pm 12/15/16
How many times do we need to review this, part XIX
-
Chris94
- 2:11pm 12/15/16
So, why hasn't Barry done anything about it?
-
Iggle
- 2:29pm 12/15/16
The Sony leak wasn't political
-
ND_in_DRO
- 2:41pm 12/15/16
The election is over.
-
Iggle
- 2:51pm 12/15/16
What should he do?
-
iairishcheeks
- 2:33pm 12/15/16
Announce a proportional response, at the time and date of our choosing.
-
Iggle
- 2:39pm 12/15/16
Okay, so your quarrel is that we haven't yet chose that time?
[NT]
-
iairishcheeks
- 2:44pm 12/15/16
Would prefer an announcement.
[
LINK
]
-
Iggle
- 2:49pm 12/15/16
The difference of approach does fuel skepticism.
[NT]
-
iairishcheeks
- 3:52pm 12/15/16
Your accusation doesn't make sense, unless you think Trump colluded with Putin. Do you?
-
NedoftheHill
- 1:41pm 12/15/16
you forgot that HRC gave her permission to release all email.
[NT]
-
Hank the Tank
- 3:36pm 12/15/16
Worth pointing out that wikileaks wouldn't exist if Chris' "centrist media sources" had upheld
-
iairishcheeks
- 1:52pm 12/15/16
And, no one would know about Clinton's e-mails, since the NYT broke that story.
-
Chris94
- 2:13pm 12/15/16
As I tried explaining the other day, I want the truth by any means possible, the purpose of the 1st.
-
iairishcheeks
- 2:28pm 12/15/16
Agreed
-
NedoftheHill
- 2:03pm 12/15/16
Its possible members of his team (i.e., Manafort) did.
-
ND_in_DRO
- 1:50pm 12/15/16
You are assuming facts not in evidence.
-
NedoftheHill
- 1:57pm 12/15/16
Per "official statements" that you claim to put stock in, Russia is behind the leak and hack
-
ND_in_DRO
- 2:04pm 12/15/16
You are incorrect on this.
-
NedoftheHill
- 2:08pm 12/15/16
I read the release straight from the Dept of Homeland Security
-
ND_in_DRO
- 2:11pm 12/15/16
You crushed the nuance in the statement with your bias.
-
NedoftheHill
- 2:13pm 12/15/16
They used almost the exact same language in describing the Russian hack of DOD.
-
Frank L
- 2:35pm 12/15/16
So, the Democrats can use that to undermine the election as well?
-
NedoftheHill
- 3:42pm 12/15/16
No the R's used it to beat up Barry over lack of cyber security though.
-
Frank L
- 3:47pm 12/15/16
Hey, everyone loves Trumps approach to cyber-security, YOU'RE going to LOVE it!
-
iairishcheeks
- 4:44pm 12/15/16
Regarding the "Constitutional Crisis"
-
ND_in_DRO
- 2:29pm 12/15/16
Since Trump gave up the issue, that's true.
-
Frank L
- 2:40pm 12/15/16
No I doubt they colluded. But when people - Baron, you, Trump - doubt the Russians' involvement....
-
Chris94
- 1:46pm 12/15/16
we can see the results of your mad dreams--but collusion--no evidence
[NT]
-
Hank the Tank
- 3:41pm 12/15/16
The White House spokesman said today that Trump may have colluded with Putin. Dems playing with fire
-
NedoftheHill
- 1:53pm 12/15/16
I provided you an official statement earlier in the week. You don't seem to comprehend what it said
[
LINK
]
-
ND_in_DRO
- 1:54pm 12/15/16
You provided a "CIA" memo that wasn't from the CIA.
-
NedoftheHill
- 2:05pm 12/15/16
CIA or not it is an official intelligence statement
-
ND_in_DRO
- 2:07pm 12/15/16
Actually, it doesn't do that. Read it. What is "the hack" that it says the Russians did?
-
NedoftheHill
- 2:12pm 12/15/16
Sorry they use the term "theft and disclosure" instead of hack and leak
-
ND_in_DRO
- 2:17pm 12/15/16
they release it for other purposes
-
Hank the Tank
- 3:45pm 12/15/16
Who is "they"
-
ND_in_DRO
- 4:16pm 12/15/16