I didn't really listen closely, but I thought he was dividing it up so that sons who managed business were not in government, and any relative advising him as president were not managing business. But, I can see how you might think that is a problem. But, either way, I'm pretty sure he was legally correct when he said he did not have to do this under the law. That is, there is no illegal conflict, even if he kept all the linkages. Perhaps that is a loophole to close, but it is a loophole.
This message has been edited 1 time(s).