The point in this thread is that the standard for racism that Conor uses is crazy. If his standard is legit, and the wall is racist, then PP is definitely racist under his standard...it is an extremely low standard, and the case for PP being racist is far stronger than for the wall.
If you want to have a conversation about whether PP is actually a racist organization, without discussing comparisons to the wall, then we perhaps we should start a different thread.
I will however, note here that you seem to be focusing on intent rather than disparate effect. Liberals believe organizations can be racist by the latter rather than the former, and under that standard, PP is definitely racist. I ask again, would you give the kKK the benefit of the doubt if they said they weren't racist, but their actions had disparate racial effect?