any scientific data to suggest that we can make any significant impact to warrant such massive intrusions in our lives they cannot. When further asked how the Paris Accord will accomplish this with it's unbalanced raid on the US vaults with redistribution to other countries and no mechanism to guarantee it's proper use, they can't. When asked why the other countries didn't go ahead with the Paris Accord even though we stepped out (yet are still cutting CO2 emissions at record pace - better than any other country atm), they cannot. Wouldn't these countries stay in it if they thought the world was at stake? If they were willing to give it a go without bigger emitters China and India claiming that they will be brought along with time, why wouldn't they do the same with the US?
When asked why Leo DiCaprio flies to receive personal awards in his private jet, or why Occasio Cortez flies to Kansas to support a no chance Dem candidate, why Pope Francis is still flying around the world on record pace, or why Al Gore has the most energy sucking mansion in Tennessee, they have no answer. (wouldn't we expect people who truly this is a global crisis to cut back on egregious carbon footprint practices?)
And this is all assuming that we grant them every aspect of their argument which is a far from settled issue. It's interesting that they have a theory that the CO2 content of Land, water, and air is in a a delicate equilibrium, and they have now evolved this theory to acknowledge that it is a cyclic equilibrium to account for evidence discounting their previous theory (it's a living, breathing theory I guess). They further say that evil man has tipped that balance. Man accounts for only a minor contributor the CO2 in the atmosphere , but they are saying that a delicate equilibrium is being thrown off. Well then i guess the multple, unpredictable volcanic eruptions spewing more CO2, methane from trapped stores during eruptions puts more of these substances into the air than we do - in particular when considering the intermittant bu fairly frequent massive eruptions, then that is completely different and doesn't throw off the cycle in the same way (btw, this last point is a real trigger issue on the CC liberal religious fact check sites because - well because it's true and conflicts with their beliefs).
Show me actual credible science that confirms the benefit of the Paris Accord before we throw out our lifestyle, and fork over our cash - especially in unequal fashion. Show me an entity that can ensure that the many, many corrupt UN nations don't pocket the money we give them for themselves. Show me an agreement that holds the other major countries to the same expectations, and an agreement that includes China and India- the biggest present offenders. Finally, show me some behavior from the personal lives of people making the assertion that this is even a real issue in their own minds.
They are religious zealots who want to impose their wacky cult faith on the general population. They want Americans to "repent" with heavy taxes because we are "sinners"(heavy CO2 producers).
CC happens to align perfectly with their liberal world view goals. It offers the perfect excuse for what they want - socialist countries controlled by a global entity. Like Jimmy Swaggert, they judge others through the prism of their dogma, but conveniently fail to apply it to themselves.