Menu
UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting
Football
2023 Notre Dame Football Schedule
2023 Notre Dame Roster
2022 Notre Dame Coaching Staff
Injury News & Updates
Notre Dame Football Depth Charts
Notre Dame Point Spreads & Betting Odds
Notre Dame Transfers
NFL Fighting Irish
Game Archive
Player Archive
Past Seasons & Results
Recruiting
Commits
News & Rumors
Class of 2018 Commit List
Class of 2019 Commit List
Class of 2020 Commit List
Class of 2021 Commit List
Archives
History
Notre Dame Bowl History
Notre Dame NFL Draft History
Notre Dame Football ESPN GameDay History
Notre Dame Heisman Trophy Winners
Notre Dame Football National Championships
Notre Dame Football Rivalries
Notre Dame Stadium
Touchdown Jesus
Basketball
Forums
Chat Room
Football Forum
Open Forum
Basketball Board
Ticket Exchange
Videos
Notre Dame Basketball Highlights
Notre Dame Football Highlights
Notre Dame Football Recruiting Highlights
Notre Dame Player Highlights
Hype Videos
Latest News
Gear
About
Advertise With Us
Contact Us
Our RSS Feeds
Community Rules
Privacy Policy
RSS
YouTube
Twitter
Facebook
Home
>
Forums
>
The Open Forum
Login
|
Register
Username
Password
Remember me
Sign in
For sure.
Author:
golfernot
(2633 Posts - Original UHND Member)
Posted at 3:15 am on Jun 24, 2019
View All
(no message)
Replies to: "For sure."
What would the stories be today if Trump hit targets in Iran? I’ll guess
-
PBHangingChad
- 7:52am 6/22/19
(40)
[View All]
The headline is already written
[NT]
[
LINK
]
-
ND_in_DRO
- 10:04am 6/23/19
I wonder what the stories would be if Iran’s previous attempted shoot down of a US drone had worked
-
CC72
- 2:18pm 6/22/19
Goes with the territory. Remember the media on the red line?
-
Frank L
- 12:40pm 6/22/19
"Bluffing all the way to WWIII"?
[NT]
-
NedoftheHill
- 10:45am 6/22/19
The actual story today was quite reasonable
[
LINK
]
-
Curly1918
- 9:41am 6/22/19
I stand corrected. I suspect that Pompeo also preferred a more measured response.
-
Curly1918
- 10:14am 6/22/19
My reading of reports was Bolton, Pompeo, Haspel and Graham were the most hawkish
-
CC72
- 2:13pm 6/22/19
Tucker ripped Bolton a new one in his Friday night show.
-
NedoftheHill
- 12:09am 6/23/19
Soo, what about Orange's choice of him for this job in the first place? Defend that.
-
Frank L
- 4:07pm 6/23/19
Regarding cyber hell...that is an assymmetric battlefield. We are more vulnerable than they are.
[NT]
-
NedoftheHill
- 10:30am 6/22/19
Probably not true
-
Chris94
- 11:18am 6/22/19
saw a fascinating documentary on that virus.
[NT]
-
WestCoastIrishFan
- 3:28pm 6/22/19
The facts you offer may be correct, but they do not necessarily support your ultimate conclusion.
-
NedoftheHill
- 12:47pm 6/22/19
For now, Iran's cyber warfare capabilities are fairly limited and our resources are vastly superior.
[
LINK
]
-
Curly1918
- 11:12am 6/22/19
Minor disagreement: the hawks are not in the Pentagon
-
Chris94
- 10:06am 6/22/19
You are correct
-
CC72
- 2:06pm 6/22/19
See response above... I goofed again.
[NT]
-
Curly1918
- 10:17am 6/22/19
.
[NT]
-
BaronVonZemo
- 8:54am 6/22/19
.
[NT]
-
BaronVonZemo
- 8:54am 6/22/19
.
[NT]
-
BaronVonZemo
- 8:54am 6/22/19
Period
[NT]
-
golfkrzy
- 3:14pm 6/22/19
Something abour Trump being a war hawk who killed hundreds because of a simple drone.......
-
BaronVonZemo
- 8:54am 6/22/19
Do you oppose birth control? Should women have a right to it?
[NT]
-
Rooster
- 11:42am 6/22/19
As long as it's not an abortifacient, no. All of those "my body, my choice" arguments apply when
-
BaronVonZemo
- 3:20pm 6/22/19
Since every issue to you is about abortion
[
LINK
]
-
ND_in_DRO
- 10:08am 6/22/19
Incorrect. The unifying issue is morality, not abortion.
-
NedoftheHill
- 10:26am 6/22/19
Sorry...The morality ship sailed when you guys got behind Trump
-
ND_in_DRO
- 1:37pm 6/22/19
For sure.
[NT]
-
golfernot
- 3:15am 6/24/19
That makes no sense. If you truly believe that, then you misunderstand me.
-
NedoftheHill
- 5:18pm 6/22/19
Voting for Trump and continuing to support his immoral actions are two different things
-
ND_in_DRO
- 7:26pm 6/23/19
Curious, are you for allowing access to birth control or do you oppose that also?
[NT]
-
Rooster
- 11:40am 6/22/19
I do not politically oppose non-abortive birth control, because there is no physical victim.
-
NedoftheHill
- 11:57am 6/22/19
Re: I do not politically oppose non-abortive birth control, because there is no physical victim.
-
Rooster
- 12:25pm 6/22/19
I refer you to Summa Theologiae for the Catholic Church's reasoning. Basically.....
-
BaronVonZemo
- 3:26pm 6/22/19
Here is what I believe on this...
[
LINK
]
-
NedoftheHill
- 12:38pm 6/22/19
This is where i differ with you and BVZ.
-
Rooster
- 6:58pm 6/22/19
Rick Santorum does not want to ban contraception.
[
LINK
]
-
NedoftheHill
- 11:41pm 6/22/19
Re: Rick Santorum does not want to ban contraception.
-
Rooster
- 11:58am 6/23/19
If you have a quote about him wanting to ban contraception, let me know. I'd be happy to consider it
-
NedoftheHill
- 7:57pm 6/23/19
Why do you think anyone wants to outlaw contraception?(Other than that PP has ignored science
-
BaronVonZemo
- 11:04pm 6/22/19