But really jim, I know that you are being intentionally obtuse because you have no answer.
Dems only first hand witness inadvertantly cleared Trump of the quid pro quo charge that Dems created with a planted, fake whistleblower. Video evidence has been posted here.
Now, Dems biggest chance at finding a chink in Trump's defense - loose cannon Rudy Guliani - has blown up too. Schiff falsely claimed in the impeachment articles a CRITICAL piece of information - that Guliani met with the Ukrainians about aid and supposedly talked about Biden, and then in chronologic order then called the Budget Office overseeing aid to withhold it. Now, even if true, this is merely circumstantial evidence, but the optics are definitely bad if true.
But it wasn't true. The number Schiff told congress was the Budget Office was just the general line to the WH which Guliani would have to use all of the time in his job. Schiff sites it several times as specific evidence for impeachment....AND IT IS FALSE.
Shockingly corrupt, and predictably inept.
I'm not really posting for you since you're lack of original thought marginalizes you. But for the rest of the TDS'ers out there who don't listen to anything but the msm, this forces them to just make the obvious decidion: "I know that this stuff is false even though I desperately want it to be true. Well, what the heck, I just want him impeached regardless because I hate Trump so much". They will have to admit it to themselves (liberals can never admit that they are wrong publicly) if nothing else.