Menu
UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting
Football
2023 Notre Dame Football Schedule
2023 Notre Dame Roster
2022 Notre Dame Coaching Staff
Injury News & Updates
Notre Dame Football Depth Charts
Notre Dame Point Spreads & Betting Odds
Notre Dame Transfers
NFL Fighting Irish
Game Archive
Player Archive
Past Seasons & Results
Recruiting
Commits
News & Rumors
Class of 2018 Commit List
Class of 2019 Commit List
Class of 2020 Commit List
Class of 2021 Commit List
Archives
History
Notre Dame Bowl History
Notre Dame NFL Draft History
Notre Dame Football ESPN GameDay History
Notre Dame Heisman Trophy Winners
Notre Dame Football National Championships
Notre Dame Football Rivalries
Notre Dame Stadium
Touchdown Jesus
Basketball
Forums
Chat Room
Football Forum
Open Forum
Basketball Board
Ticket Exchange
Videos
Notre Dame Basketball Highlights
Notre Dame Football Highlights
Notre Dame Football Recruiting Highlights
Notre Dame Player Highlights
Hype Videos
Latest News
Gear
About
Advertise With Us
Contact Us
Our RSS Feeds
Community Rules
Privacy Policy
RSS
YouTube
Twitter
Facebook
Home
>
Forums
>
The Open Forum
Login
|
Register
Username
Password
Remember me
Sign in
You're a constitutional lawyer. What law did they follow? Be specific?
Author:
ELP
(8518 Posts - Joined: Oct 18, 2020)
Posted at 11:42 pm on Dec 11, 2020
View All
(no message)
Replies to: "You're a constitutional lawyer. What law did they follow? Be specific?"
SCOTUS to Trump: You lost. Again.
[NT]
-
ND521
- 6:46pm 12/11/20
(64)
[View All]
Was told SCOTUS was going to hand election to Trump in a hysterical post here.
-
TakethetrainKnute
- 7:09am 12/12/20
Trump's Judges can now go to their parties in the Hamptons without being harassed.
[NT]
-
ELP
- 8:02pm 12/11/20
They can also sleep with knowledge they followed the law not the con artist.
[NT]
-
Hibakusha
- 10:53pm 12/11/20
You're a constitutional lawyer. What law did they follow? Be specific?
[NT]
-
ELP
- 11:42pm 12/11/20
Reality Law.
[NT]
-
golfernot
- 4:30am 12/12/20
Not a lawyer but you can read the decision.
-
Hibakusha
- 11:51pm 12/11/20
So you two really don't know what law. It's just something you heard on The View.
[NT]
-
ELP
- 2:19pm 12/12/20
That's that. Onward to GA Senate race.
[NT]
-
NDavenue
- 7:35pm 12/11/20
Which Georgia? The Sherman “March to the Sea”
-
Tenacious_P
- 10:26pm 12/11/20
What about “Midnight Train” Georgia? “Night the lights went out” Georgia? “Sweet Brown” Georgia?
-
TakethetrainKnute
- 7:54am 12/12/20
Which one are you?
[NT]
-
NedoftheHill
- 1:57am 12/12/20
“That’s that” was 5 weeks ago.
-
conorlarkin
- 10:02pm 12/11/20
"Democracy."
[NT]
-
jakers
- 10:26pm 12/11/20
Yep go Loeffler and Perdure.
[NT]
-
THEISMANCARR
- 9:39pm 12/11/20
Exactly! That is where the fate of the country shall really be decided,
[NT]
-
Curly1918
- 9:08pm 12/11/20
And placed in the hands of the Right Reverend Raphael Warnock & a guy named Jon who just turned 33.
[NT]
-
ND521
- 9:49pm 12/11/20
How can you possibly support Warnock? How?
[NT]
-
jakers
- 10:21pm 12/11/20
Better haircut than opponent.
[NT]
-
golfernot
- 4:32am 12/12/20
trucked in ballots?
-
und67
- 10:39pm 12/11/20
I hear that a plane from Brussels scheduled to land at Hartsfield on the 4th. Very suspicious.
[NT]
-
golfernot
- 4:36am 12/12/20
Oh Lordy - Wash, Rinse, Repeat! Brilliant.
[NT]
-
jimbasil
- 12:48am 12/12/20
A credit card.
[NT]
-
conorlarkin
- 10:29pm 12/11/20
White smoke is pouring from the White House.
[NT]
-
Hibakusha
- 7:13pm 12/11/20
Docket entry:
-
conorlarkin
- 7:02pm 12/11/20
Following clear precedent... and the same position that Scalia supported on a states rights basis.
[
LINK
]
-
Curly1918
- 7:13pm 12/11/20
The Court did nothing today consistent with “following precedent.”
-
conorlarkin
- 8:19pm 12/11/20
There was no ruling on the merits. This is the case that predicted the outcome.
[NT]
[
LINK
]
-
Curly1918
- 9:02pm 12/11/20
Team Trump: 1. USA: 56
[NT]
-
Chris94
- 7:09pm 12/11/20
Trump has made you quite the nationalist. Look at you, putting America first.
[NT]
-
NedoftheHill
- 1:53am 12/12/20
What's sad is, Trump not putting Americans first and sadder still, y'all supporting him
-
jimbasil
- 2:17am 12/12/20
Actually it is more a victory for our judicial system.
-
Curly1918
- 7:19pm 12/11/20
The Judicial system is afraid of harassment and getting cancelled. That's not a victory.
[NT]
-
ELP
- 8:09pm 12/11/20
Yes very sad. Even the judges are intimidated by the radical left who would be at their houses.
[NT]
-
THEISMANCARR
- 9:41pm 12/11/20
Yes, some people say much traffic through the Gorsuch neighborhood Wednesday.
-
golfernot
- 4:41am 12/12/20
When they swat down Dem overreach you will see things differently.
-
Curly1918
- 9:05pm 12/11/20
Barrett, Kavanaugh, Gorsuch. We all took a leap for them. They responded with cowardice.
[NT]
-
ELP
- 9:19pm 12/11/20
Where did you leap from? Roof? Couch? Kitchen chair? You should be careful.
-
golfernot
- 4:44am 12/12/20
Took a leap? WTF are you talking about?
[NT]
-
ShowMeIrish
- 9:41pm 12/11/20
You know damn well what I'm talking about. Conservatives rallied around these three.
[NT]
-
ELP
- 9:48pm 12/11/20
So therefore their jurisprudence should be grounded in political loyalty?
[NT]
-
conorlarkin
- 10:20pm 12/11/20
It should be grounded by looking at the evidence. And there is evidence. They took the easy way out.
[NT]
-
ELP
- 10:34pm 12/11/20
Indeed. There is much evidence of chronic stupidity. Admissible evidence not so much.
[NT]
-
golfernot
- 4:48am 12/12/20
There was no evidence. You got played. I would be pissed if I were you. Blame the con man.
[NT]
-
Hibakusha
- 10:52pm 12/11/20
Of course there was evidence. Video. Witness testimony. Data.
[NT]
-
jakers
- 11:04pm 12/11/20
QAnon “evidence” and courtroom evidence are two different things.
-
conorlarkin
- 5:26am 12/12/20
OMG. Get a life. Find a hobby. Try yoga or something.
[NT]
-
golfernot
- 4:49am 12/12/20
All of it, in every court denied. From District to Supreme Court. The evidence was fraudulent.
[NT]
-
Hibakusha
- 11:17pm 12/11/20
Liar. They did not refute the evidence. Quit making things up.
[NT]
-
jakers
- 11:28pm 12/11/20
Cannot refute what doesn't exist.
[NT]
-
golfernot
- 4:50am 12/12/20
We may disagree, but the courts all saw the same thing.
-
Hibakusha
- 11:45pm 12/11/20
They didn't refute the evidence because they never took the time to look at the evidence.
[NT]
-
ELP
- 11:39pm 12/11/20
Claque, great word.
[NT]
-
Hibakusha
- 7:22pm 12/11/20
Benefit of an ND education!
[NT]
-
Curly1918
- 7:24pm 12/11/20
Respectful bow.
[NT]
-
Hibakusha
- 7:30pm 12/11/20
The miracle is that it has sustained me for over half a century.
-
Curly1918
- 7:41pm 12/11/20
Heard Alito speak at LA Italian-Irish bar virtual 'dinner' a couple of months ago. Still trying to
-
ND521
- 7:07pm 12/11/20
Argued several cases in front of him when he was on the Circuit Court. Very smart and
-
Frank L
- 11:06pm 12/11/20
No doubt. Very smart and seems to be a decent man, though his personal leanings
-
ND521
- 12:37am 12/12/20
helps balance out Sotomayor's radical bench work, don't you think? Or is he
-
ColeyO
- 8:43am 12/12/20
He is light years smarter than her. And a much more civil person.
[NT]
-
Frank L
- 8:30pm 12/13/20
Hmmm... no projection here about a narrow view?????
[NT]
-
Curly1918
- 9:07pm 12/11/20
Nope, just prefer a bit more moderation when it comes to the law. Roberts is a good
-
ND521
- 12:46am 12/12/20