since you did, for your convenience, here's what BVZ posted on the topic of energy grid security...
"Biden's energy policy combined w/expanded online economic dependence make protecting the electric grid a top priority. With Biden's New Green Deal, not only will our power go down with an attack or disaster, but our transportation will as well, and our dependence to online commerce and education (independent of Biden) further that dependence on the electric grid.
Unfortunately, virtually none of the giant "infrastructure" bill is allocated to this. There are just SO MANY political payback/payoff causes to throw money at instead."
To this I replied that in ~15 sec. I was able to search out the Bloomberg article (from 5 days before BVZ's post) entitled "Biden Rushes to Protect Power Grid as Hacking Threats Grow"...the article then goes into some detail as to who the players are and how the Biden administration is trying to make this a shared program between government and the private sector...if you haven't read it your self, take a few minutes to do so...very encouraging, but of course we all need to make sure 'rubber hits the road'.
Now I've had a fair number of conversations and presentations in the presence of very intelligent and accomplished individuals and my line of reasoning hasn't failed me...but no one is perfect, so again, if I failed to adjudge that the Bloomberg article was clear refutation of Baron's central message (i.e. Biden was not addressing the threat of cyber attacks on our electrical grid), then do me a favor and help me learn what went wrong...that goes for you, too, Baron, if you're reading this.
As far as using the term "incontrovertible", I do stand corrected...absolutely "Nothing" on this Board is "Incontrovertible"...no matter how much evidence is provided.