Ok then what is the problem then? If there's talent and the talent is being used well and coached well?
And 1 or 2 guys that were mentioned over those 8 or 9 years is far more than many of the Top 10 teams have produced.
And YOU said "undeveloped" I said...UNDERdeveloped. UNdeveloped is like an Amir Carlisle (now a Cardinal) or Romeo Okwara goes and undrafted and by the end of this year was one of the stalwarts on the Giants front has NJ.com writing an article as to why he wasnt drafted.
And just because a player can come in a play soon doesn't mean his head coach or coordinator used him correctly or put him in a position to win.
It speaks more to his position coached who taught him good enough technique. But did the HC, DC, or OC use him correctly? Did the HC, DC, or OC coach the correct strategy for this players ability? There is a major disconnect if the players is getting good coaching from his position coach and then it's lost on the field. That again is the HC's concern.
So ultimately this is about this perceived lack of talent. There isn't. Michigan and Washington both had several classes far below that of ND. But in 2,3yrs new coaches come in and they're seemingly solid among the Top 5? If BK was coaching either school...do you think the same would be said?