Your horse died yesterday. Could you consider that Clemson might have still scored another way without throwing toward Love? Your repeated reference to him as the difference maker in the game makes you look foolish. But imgaine you are correct and the game is close at the the half. Clemson would have found another way to score because they don’t depend on one player like you seem to suggest and have much better coaching. And even with him on the field how could he make the offense better? Is that Kelly’s 2.0 job? Let it go.
This message has been edited 1 time(s).