from that article...
-----------------------
Does Fusion produce radioactive nuclear waste the same way fission does?
Nuclear fission power plants have the disadvantage of generating unstable nuclei; some of these are radioactive for millions of years. Fusion on the other hand does not create any long-lived radioactive nuclear waste. A fusion reactor produces helium, which is an inert gas. It also produces and consumes tritium within the plant in a closed circuit. Tritium is radioactive (a beta emitter) but its half life is short. It is only used in low amounts so, unlike long-lived radioactive nuclei, it cannot produce any serious danger. THE ACTIVATION OF THE REACTOR'S STRUCTURAL MATERIAL BY INTENSE NEUTRON FLUXES IS ANOTHER ISSUE. This strongly depends on what solution for blanket and other structures has been adopted, and its reduction is an important challenge for future fusion experiments. (emphasis mine)
----------------------
As an engineer, I'm concerned about the effect of 14 Mev Neutrons bombarding today's containment materials (Note: today's reactors experience neutron energies on the order of 0.025 ev...fast reactors...1Mev)...that's a huge concern for keeping a Fusion Reactor Plant operational for extended periods of time...but who knows what the future holds...would love to worry about that once a sustainable and sizable net positive reaction is achieved...probably not in most board members' lifetimes...here's hoping our progeny will thank us for today's work.
Link: https://www.iaea.org/topics/energy/fusion/faqs