I believe that the First Amendment specifically mentions twitter

Home > Forums > The Open Forum

| Register

I believe that the First Amendment specifically mentions twitter

Author: Chris94 (35731 Posts - Original UHND Member)

Posted at 9:11 pm on Dec 16, 2022

View All

Don’t hold me to that - been a while since I read it. But no way there would be all this freak out if it didn’t.

Replies to: "I believe that the First Amendment specifically mentions twitter"

Twitter Files Part 6: The FBI had 80 agents working on Twitter accounts. [NT] - Irishize - 7:25pm 12/16/22 (33) [View All]
- Not sure the implication of 'FBI = Liberal' fits... [LINK] - TyroneIrish - 12:09am 12/18/22
  - Nobody implied that. [NT] - jabbadoody5 - 12:36am 12/18/22
    - The implication by Trump supporters (Incl. FOX) has been that the FBI was politically motivated [LINK] - TyroneIrish - 1:45am 12/18/22
- Easy way to follow nuts, extremists and criminals. [NT] - FinnMcCool - 7:51pm 12/16/22
  - That's not all they were doing though. - jabbadoody5 - 7:37am 12/17/22
    - It's most interesting that people concerned with fascism and authoritarianism - iairishcheeks - 1:24pm 12/17/22
      - It could be interesting. - jabbadoody5 - 1:29pm 12/17/22
  - Yes, antifa was indeed using it to coordinate terrorist attacks. [NT] - jakers - 9:28pm 12/16/22
    - They can’t lose face publicly. But we all know for sure now that this was happening as suspected. [NT] - BaronVonZemo - 11:48pm 12/16/22
- Violations of the First Amendment are a nothingburger. [NT] - jabbadoody5 - 7:38pm 12/16/22
  - How is it Violations of the First Amendment? [NT] - jimbasil - 7:44pm 12/16/22
    - How is it a violation for the Federal government to participate in the suppression of speech? - jabbadoody5 - 9:43pm 12/16/22
      - Yes, that is the question - Are you not able to answer it? Ya see, you think you're being sarcastic - jimbasil - 10:08pm 12/16/22
        FBI personnel were sending emails to Twitter Mods to take action on individual accounts. - jabbadoody5 - 12:01am 12/17/22
        80 agents, unreal. [NT] - Frankx - 9:51am 12/17/22
        What's more "unreal" is that the trash on this board continue to ignore key facts - jabbadoody5 - 9:59am 12/17/22
    - I believe that the First Amendment specifically mentions twitter - Chris94 - 9:11pm 12/16/22
      - Yep, let's just continue to ignore the govt's involvement in this. [NT] - jabbadoody5 - 12:04am 12/17/22
      - Listen to yourself defending the indefensible that you would have denied even happened if not - BaronVonZemo - 11:43pm 12/16/22
        You've heard of this, right? [LINK] - jimbasil - 11:51pm 12/16/22
        Patriot Act doesn’t allow for officials to target politically or influencing elections. [NT] - BaronVonZemo - 12:39am 12/17/22
        You might want to read it before you comment. [NT] - jimbasil - 1:46am 12/17/22
        You definitely should, but you won't, nor do you care if your told not to do so by the Dem media. [NT] - BaronVonZemo - 2:53am 12/17/22
        That makes zero sense. [NT] - jimbasil - 6:02am 12/17/22
    - Yeah, I didn't think you'd have an answer. [NT] - jimbasil - 9:03pm 12/16/22
      - Talking to yourself again ? Seek help [NT] - ColeyO - 9:34pm 12/16/22
        You're tediously dull. [NT] - jimbasil - 11:27pm 12/16/22
        Liberalism Rule #1....and zero self awareness. [NT] - BaronVonZemo - 3:13am 12/17/22
        You realize these continued rule posts are nonsense. [NT] - jimbasil - 6:04am 12/17/22
      - Censorship by proxy. Clear violation of the 1st Amendment. [NT] - irishsmashmouth - 9:10pm 12/16/22
        Do you know the first amendment? Prolly not so I'll help you with this. [LINK] - jimbasil - 9:30pm 12/16/22
        Prolly? Genius! [NT] - irishsmashmouth - 11:22pm 12/16/22
        Another thing you just don't know, but I'll help you again. - jimbasil - 11:25pm 12/16/22