The allegation that the US Government sought to influence social media "content" re a political campaign/contest strikes you as what? 4th Amendment violation? 5th Amendment violation? 6th Amendment violation? 8th Amendment violation?
Don't play stupid.
Did the aggrieved party in your scenario file a lawsuit in federal court? Can you link us to the pleadings?
And btw, you lack standing to say "that no one should be okay with this type of government overreach and unilateral manipulation of what people are saying and what is being seen and amplified. It isn't good." You were certainly OK that Russia did so in 2016. The rest of us were not, to include the GOP controlled Senate Intelligence Committee.
Your beef is a First Amendment beef, regardless of whether you knew so.
Replies to: "Your beef is a First Amendment beef, regardless of whether you knew so."
- RepubliQans should use caution from moving forward with anymore show hearings - Quest4twelve - 6:27am 2/9/23
(35) [View All]
- All Republicans are scum. There is no logic only hate in their actions. - NocalIrish - 7:37pm 2/9/23
- It was indeed embarrassing for those exiled, ex-Twitter scumbags. [NT] - jakers - 12:32pm 2/9/23
- Did somebody mention "Show Hearings"? [NT]
[IMAGE]
- BaronVonZemo - 10:04am 2/9/23
- What an assclown he is. [NT] - fredyo - 10:42am 2/9/23
- Raskin echoed my sentiments re private entity v state action, beginning at 1:40 on counter. - conorlarkin - 9:02am 2/9/23
- This is 2 apologies you owe me. Nowhere did I state that it was a 1A issue. - jakers - 9:42am 2/9/23
- You have couched it as government interference with elections and discourse re elections, correct? [LINK]
- conorlarkin - 10:37am 2/9/23
- Just stop lying and own that you were wrong. Apologize. Have some character. - jakers - 12:30pm 2/9/23
- Your beef is a First Amendment beef, regardless of whether you knew so. - conorlarkin - 1:43pm 2/9/23
- Jesus Christ, you are a lying weasel. We get it, you're surrendering and trying to retreat. - jakers - 4:26pm 2/9/23
- No. You can have a discussion about govt involvement in enforcement of social media policy - jabbadoody5 - 1:50pm 2/9/23
- I see. The GOP led house wants Congress to be a philosophy class? Very cool. [NT]
- conorlarkin - 2:48pm 2/9/23
- This really isn't that complicated. - jabbadoody5 - 3:14pm 2/9/23
- He's trying to make this "debate" go away. This is how he surrenders. [NT] - jakers - 4:27pm 2/9/23
- This really isn't that complicated. - jabbadoody5 - 3:14pm 2/9/23
- I see. The GOP led house wants Congress to be a philosophy class? Very cool. [NT]
- conorlarkin - 2:48pm 2/9/23
- Your beef is a First Amendment beef, regardless of whether you knew so. - conorlarkin - 1:43pm 2/9/23
- You're pivoting. - jabbadoody5 - 10:57am 2/9/23
- ... meaning your beef is a First Amendment beef. [NT] [LINK] - conorlarkin - 10:41am 2/9/23
- Just stop lying and own that you were wrong. Apologize. Have some character. - jakers - 12:30pm 2/9/23
- You have couched it as government interference with elections and discourse re elections, correct? [LINK]
- conorlarkin - 10:37am 2/9/23
- Don't put words in my mouth. - jabbadoody5 - 9:14am 2/9/23
- Read your own words. [NT]
[LINK]
- conorlarkin - 9:20am 2/9/23
- And this thread .... [NT]
[LINK]
- conorlarkin - 9:20am 2/9/23
- Conor, where did I specifically state that I had an issue with Twitter? - jabbadoody5 - 9:40am 2/9/23
- Gov't involvement/interference/tinkering must violate a constitutional right or federal law. [LINK]
- conorlarkin - 10:22am 2/9/23
- I would like to know why. - jabbadoody5 - 10:38am 2/9/23
- Without a breach of federal law or a constitutional right, there is no relief. - conorlarkin - 10:51am 2/9/23
- Exactly. And don't you think it's prudent that the nature of those interactions be understood? - jabbadoody5 - 10:59am 2/9/23
- The GOP led House can investigate whatever they wish. They have the majority. - conorlarkin - 12:40pm 2/9/23
- You're putting words in my mouth again. - jabbadoody5 - 12:59pm 2/9/23
- The GOP led House can investigate whatever they wish. They have the majority. - conorlarkin - 12:40pm 2/9/23
- Exactly. And don't you think it's prudent that the nature of those interactions be understood? - jabbadoody5 - 10:59am 2/9/23
- Without a breach of federal law or a constitutional right, there is no relief. - conorlarkin - 10:51am 2/9/23
- Still waiting. Coward. [NT] - jakers - 10:23am 2/9/23
- I would like to know why. - jabbadoody5 - 10:38am 2/9/23
- Gov't involvement/interference/tinkering must violate a constitutional right or federal law. [LINK]
- conorlarkin - 10:22am 2/9/23
- Conor, where did I specifically state that I had an issue with Twitter? - jabbadoody5 - 9:40am 2/9/23
- And this thread .... [NT]
[LINK]
- conorlarkin - 9:20am 2/9/23
- Read your own words. [NT]
[LINK]
- conorlarkin - 9:20am 2/9/23
- This is 2 apologies you owe me. Nowhere did I state that it was a 1A issue. - jakers - 9:42am 2/9/23
- What was embarrassing about it? [NT] - jabbadoody5 - 8:34am 2/9/23
- So was the SOTU. Clearly their rudderless shit slinging and baseless lies are not working [NT]
- Jerseymick - 7:36am 2/9/23
- All Republicans are scum. MAGAT's are inbred morons. - NocalIrish - 7:34pm 2/9/23
- Nice try…SOTU is routine tradition. Show hearings where the GQP get embarrassed are not. [NT]
- Quest4twelve - 7:39am 2/9/23
- I'm saying GQP got owned by Dark Brandon. [NT] - Jerseymick - 10:00am 2/9/23
- Corn Pop was a baaaad dude! LOL. Mr 10% [NT] - ELP - 8:23am 2/9/23
- LOL - Iggle - 8:18am 2/9/23
- It’s a marathon not a sprint. - Curly1918 - 7:06am 2/9/23