The science has changed, you need to get on board.

Home > Forums > The Open Forum

| Register

The science has changed, you need to get on board.

Author: Protagonist (925 Posts - Joined: Oct 21, 2012)

Posted at 1:02 am on Feb 14, 2023

View All

(no message)

Replies to: "The science has changed, you need to get on board."

wow. ty, chris and jim, you can take off your masks now [NT] [LINK] - WestCoastIrishFan - 10:45pm 2/13/23 (30) [View All]
- The CDC no longer believes in evidence based medicine - BaronVonZemo - 8:53am 2/14/23
  - Just like you - You must be supporting the CDC then. [NT] - jimbasil - 10:55am 2/14/23
- You've got a very short attention span...the attached NEJM report's data shows masks work... [LINK] - TyroneIrish - 11:14pm 2/13/23
  - Masks are Progressive MAGA hats. [NT] - Curly1918 - 9:01am 2/14/23
    - The NEJM report says masks work...on what basis do you disagree, Curly? [NT] - TyroneIrish - 12:41pm 2/14/23
      - Maybe on the actual "studies" that say they were useless. - Iggle - 2:06pm 2/14/23
  - The science has changed, you need to get on board. [NT] - Protagonist - 1:02am 2/14/23
    - The NEJM article is not a study & has no data & was written before Cochran Study release - BaronVonZemo - 9:18am 2/14/23
      - All anyone had to do was "CLICK" on the "LINK" to the actual report...here, let me help you and your [LINK] - TyroneIrish - 10:59am 2/14/23
        Wow, I read it and it is obvious there is no control aspect to their data. It’s like saying in&out - Protagonist - 11:46am 2/14/23
        First off, do you now see how stupid you were to follow Baron's "assessment"?...are you ready to - TyroneIrish - 12:14pm 2/14/23
        No, if anything I see how stupid you are with your string theory links. [NT] [IMAGE] - Protagonist - 12:32pm 2/14/23
        Well, clearly you are impenetrable to logic, reason and data...thanks for eliminating all doubt. [NT] - TyroneIrish - 12:38pm 2/14/23
        Still clinging to old science, old data, old links… thats real logical. [NT] - Protagonist - 3:18pm 2/14/23
        LOL...please define what "Old Science"..."Old Data"..."Old Links" mean...this should be fun. [NT] - TyroneIrish - 8:27pm 2/14/23
        Anything you post about Covid. [NT] - Protagonist - 8:47pm 2/14/23
      - You just made his day by referencing his post. [NT] - Protagonist - 10:01am 2/14/23
        I Knew he’d post some falsity to thus. Misrepresenting an editorial as a study w/data and - BaronVonZemo - 10:06am 2/14/23
        One more thing...how does ANY doctor who reads NEJM not IMMEDIATELY go to the 'References' when - TyroneIrish - 11:17am 2/14/23
        
        You can apologize...for the first time ever...right here and now. It's the first step in healing - TyroneIrish - 11:07am 2/14/23
        
        Ha! - Nigel Tufnel - 10:32am 2/14/23
    - Are you in position to refute the New England Journal off Medicine’s - TyroneIrish - 2:06am 2/14/23
      - I’m not, but other scientist are and you don’t want to believe them. [NT] - Protagonist - 9:45am 2/14/23
        I have my doubts, as do others (see link), about Cochrane Library's potential bias, among other [LINK] - TyroneIrish - 11:35am 2/14/23
        
        Bingo. He'll ride this one all the way down to the turf. [NT] - jakers - 11:05am 2/14/23
      - You're no more qualified to make sense of these conflicting studies than the rest of us. - - jabbadoody5 - 8:14am 2/14/23
        You're dancing around this example...now that I've done the work for you to see the NEJM report can - TyroneIrish - 1:08pm 2/14/23
        
        Oh come on now, of course he is. LINK Please! [NT] - Frankx - 10:44am 2/14/23
- Love how they try to poke at the study while glossing over the biggest reveal… - BaronVonZemo - 10:50pm 2/13/23
  - . [NT] - jabbadoody5 - 8:13am 2/14/23