article specifically identified the "Study" and provided a link to it, which shows their full report...plus the report provides a link to an even more detailed set of DATA in the "Supplemental Appendix"...that's all the data anyone would require from a world renowned medical journal.
Kind of odd that Baron, after 30 years of practice, never thought to seek out the referenced report that formed the basis of the Editorial article...at least it does to me?
Baron was WRONG...the Editorial DID CONTAIN A REPORT...and it had plenty of DATA.
btw, you're looking pretty silly right now...care to go on?