I also understand that your claims about JCPOA are based on dismissing information that others do not dismiss.
I know that my statements about Soros horrible behavior were not based on the idea that "jews run the world". His religion and his race never even entered my mind ( I thought he was a catholic kicked out of Hungary for the same behavior btw). I was judging his personal actions and character. I also would not consider your comments to be anti-semitic by my own estimation, but you have set this new standard that should also apply both ways.
You have chosen to be hyper critical and see things that are not there. So ok. You don't get to be the person who defines all anti-semitism. it doesn't just have to be related to the stupid worldview that jews somehow run everything. it can also be an innate bias that wants to discount their views and credibility because of simple loathing. You have discounted their credible information. If you are going to say that I am guilty of anti-semitism for somehow unintentionally treading too near to the "runnig the world stereotype", i can equally say that you have dismissed the information from the Jewish state for no apparent reason other than that you don't give theJewish state credence.....that was also a tenant of nazi-ism. That is also why so many were frustrated with Obama and Biden's treatment of the state of Israel.
Still, it wasn't i who threw the race card at the other first.
Now let's just talk brass tacks a minute regarding expertise issues and dismissals. You posted what I professionally know to be junk, citing a 2 year old government study review on masks with no Randomized Controlled Trials, and asserted that it somehow stood as proof that there was evidence to undermine the recent Cochrane Review of the 12 Randomized Controlled Studies to date on masks that meet their exacting standards which found that they were not seen to have benefit, and more importantly - clearly showed that there was no evidence to argue FOR mask policy implementation either now NOR in the past when Fauci and Biden did their thing with COVID. I pointed out the argument, but I didn't dismiss you.
In this case, i am posting in YOUR field of expertise, and you have dismissed it in knee jerk fashion. You called me a liar, and when i showed you the evidence that you said did not exist, you dismissed it as coming from an "idealogue" (Cheif of staff of NSA during the time in question) without even giving reasoning why the information is considered false or inferior as I had done with you when our roles were reversed.
As a grown man, I can see that you see things in only one direction.
I prefer not to call people "liars" when they aren't (I legitimately believe that Iranian information when it was reported, and I do now). I prefer to not call people racists wen they are not. (I do believe George Soros, the individual, undeniably has a political goal of influence in our country that cannot be argued. Even if i had known that he was Jewish, it wouldn't have occured to me that it was relevant in any way to the discussion).
That is the viewpoint of a grown man.
Now, how we proceed from here is in your court, but please understand that no discussion is worthwhile unless both sides are playing by the same rules and expectations.