but in a secure setting and with the proviso that sources are not disclosed...sounds quite reasonable...unless the GOP is only interested in creating a political advertisement. ...here's an excerpt from your own link (good on you for using links, btw)...
---------------------
In a Wednesday statement to Newsmax, the FBI said, "During today's call, Director Wray offered to provide the committee's chairman and ranking member an opportunity to review information responsive to the subpoena in a secure manner to accommodate the committee, while protecting the confidentiality and safety of sources and important investigative sensitives. The FBI has continually demonstrated its commitment to working with the committee to accommodate its request, from scheduling briefings and calls to now allowing the chair to review information in person. The FBI remains committed to cooperating with the committee in good faith."
----------------------
You shoot yourself in the foot so many times, it's a wonder you can get to your computer.
ADVERTISEMENT
Nonsense...your own "NewsMax" link states that Wray has offered to show Comer, et al, the document,
Replies to: "Nonsense...your own "NewsMax" link states that Wray has offered to show Comer, et al, the document,"
- Wray won't allow an unclassified document to congressional subpoena purported to link Biden to - BaronVonZemo - 4:24pm 5/31/23
(17) [View All]
- Nonsense...your own "NewsMax" link states that Wray has offered to show Comer, et al, the document, - TyroneIrish - 12:43am 6/1/23
- BTW, Wray offered Comer the opportunity to view the requested document. [LINK]
- conorlarkin - 6:43pm 5/31/23
- Does Comer’s account of the document stand up in court,counselor? What law school did you attend? [NT] - BaronVonZemo - 7:19pm 5/31/23
- And ? [NT]
- ColeyO - 6:50pm 5/31/23
- Comer already knows what the doc says from WB. He needs to be able to show the public which is why - BaronVonZemo - 7:44am 6/1/23
- You sound more unhinged everyday. Are you aware of the judicial branch??? - conorlarkin - 5:30pm 5/31/23
- The decision to prosecute falls to the prosecutors in the Biden DOJ. It is YOU who are unaware. [LINK]
- BaronVonZemo - 6:14pm 5/31/23
- I thought a sitting President couldn't be indicted??? - conorlarkin - 6:23pm 5/31/23
- Pivot as you realize you embarrassed yourself. Regarding your deflection: Your rules, but… - BaronVonZemo - 7:16pm 5/31/23
- I thought a sitting President couldn't be indicted??? - conorlarkin - 6:23pm 5/31/23
- The decision to prosecute falls to the prosecutors in the Biden DOJ. It is YOU who are unaware. [LINK]
- BaronVonZemo - 6:14pm 5/31/23
- Time to stop playing with this guy.now says they can come and see, - cubsfanin16 - 4:56pm 5/31/23
- Wray wouldn't acknowledge that the document referred to by WB actually existed for the past month... - BaronVonZemo - 12:27am 6/1/23
- Welp, he can go to jail then. [NT]
- jabbadoody5 - 4:40pm 5/31/23
- Only the DOJ could charge him... so he's not sweating anything. [NT]
- Curly1918 - 4:43pm 5/31/23
- Crime family brethren protecting each other [NT]
- ColeyO - 6:48pm 5/31/23
- I think Wray just wrapped up an anchor spot on ABC News. [NT] - BaronVonZemo - 7:20pm 5/31/23
- Congress is going to get him on Contempt. [NT]
- jabbadoody5 - 4:56pm 5/31/23
- Means nada: Congress held Eric Holder in contempt and .nothing came of it. [NT] [LINK] - Curly1918 - 7:24pm 5/31/23
- Crime family brethren protecting each other [NT]
- ColeyO - 6:48pm 5/31/23
- Only the DOJ could charge him... so he's not sweating anything. [NT]
- Curly1918 - 4:43pm 5/31/23
Consent Management