I think she means is it perilous to Democrats. If they were perilous to the GOP, she'd be promoting them. So, it isn't really perilous to democracy. Do you agree?...and if not, why not?
This message has been edited 1 time(s).
What did she mean? Was she lying?
Replies to: "What did she mean? Was she lying?"
- “No Labels is perilous to our democracy," [LINK]
- iairishcheeks - 10:38am 11/3/23
(11) [View All]
- The GOP is seriously fractured thanks to DJT...long time Conservatives, like Judge Luttig predict - TyroneIrish - 1:02pm 11/3/23
- You know what she means, because you’re not stupid. - Chris94 - 10:59am 11/3/23
- What did she mean? Was she lying? - NedoftheHill - 11:10am 11/3/23
- Here you go Ned: - TampaIrish - 11:32am 11/3/23
- The defenders of democracy... [NT] - iairishcheeks - 11:47am 11/3/23
- Trump is the only actual threat to democracy. And we all know it. - Chris94 - 11:31am 11/3/23
- Except that Biden is the only actual threat to democracy. And we all know it. - NedoftheHill - 10:10pm 11/3/23
- No it's not as simple as that, simpleton. [NT] - iairishcheeks - 11:48am 11/3/23
- Here you go Ned: - TampaIrish - 11:32am 11/3/23
- Solid way to avoid providing a substantive response. - iairishcheeks - 11:02am 11/3/23
- The emptiest barrel makes the most noise. [NT] - PaND - 11:03am 11/3/23
- What did she mean? Was she lying? - NedoftheHill - 11:10am 11/3/23