Menu
UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting
Football
2023 Notre Dame Football Schedule
2023 Notre Dame Roster
2022 Notre Dame Coaching Staff
Injury News & Updates
Notre Dame Football Depth Charts
Notre Dame Point Spreads & Betting Odds
Notre Dame Transfers
NFL Fighting Irish
Game Archive
Player Archive
Past Seasons & Results
Recruiting
Commits
News & Rumors
Class of 2018 Commit List
Class of 2019 Commit List
Class of 2020 Commit List
Class of 2021 Commit List
Archives
History
Notre Dame Bowl History
Notre Dame NFL Draft History
Notre Dame Football ESPN GameDay History
Notre Dame Heisman Trophy Winners
Notre Dame Football National Championships
Notre Dame Football Rivalries
Notre Dame Stadium
Touchdown Jesus
Basketball
Forums
Chat Room
Football Forum
Open Forum
Basketball Board
Ticket Exchange
Videos
Notre Dame Basketball Highlights
Notre Dame Football Highlights
Notre Dame Football Recruiting Highlights
Notre Dame Player Highlights
Hype Videos
Latest News
Gear
About
Advertise With Us
Contact Us
Our RSS Feeds
Community Rules
Privacy Policy
RSS
YouTube
Twitter
Facebook
Home
>
Forums
>
The Open Forum
Login
|
Register
Username
Password
Remember me
Sign in
Your post reveals that your goal is to convict Trump, not seek justice.
Author:
BaronVonZemo
(52897 Posts - Joined: Nov 19, 2010)
Posted at 8:54 am on Apr 26, 2024
View All
(no message)
Replies to: "Your post reveals that your goal is to convict Trump, not seek justice."
My feeling after listening to the oral arguments is that SCOTUS will punt.
-
Curly1918
- 5:50pm 4/25/24
(31)
[View All]
Sad SCOTUS might aid the rapist felon avoid additional criminal charges until post election.
[NT]
-
FinnMcCool
- 8:28pm 4/25/24
Do you think they are worried about the incest felon being president again?
[NT]
-
NedoftheHill
- 2:02am 4/26/24
They should not have granted cert in the first place.
-
conorlarkin
- 7:58pm 4/25/24
Your post reveals that your goal is to convict Trump, not seek justice.
[NT]
-
BaronVonZemo
- 8:54am 4/26/24
My hope is that elected officials and the judiciary honor their oaths.
-
conorlarkin
- 10:13am 4/26/24
This is why Leonard Leo amassed $1.6B …no way the conservative Justices renege on a deal.
[NT]
[
LINK
]
-
TyroneIrish
- 9:02pm 4/25/24
All true. If so, Extreme Court's stall tactics designed to help T Rump.
[NT]
-
FinnMcCool
- 8:32pm 4/25/24
Probably. The Left must be relieved that Alvin Bragg's NY case is so strong.
[NT]
-
NedoftheHill
- 6:17pm 4/25/24
After the obviously pretextual valuation case, this will be a hung jury or mistrial
[NT]
-
LanceManion
- 7:02pm 4/25/24
Hung jury? Is that due to Pecker's testimony?
[NT]
-
irishsmashmouth
- 7:53pm 4/25/24
Pecker brought the wood
[NT]
-
LanceManion
- 8:04pm 4/25/24
Maybe a hung jury. He won’t be acquitted.
[NT]
-
Frank L
- 7:51pm 4/25/24
Agreeance
[NT]
-
LanceManion
- 8:04pm 4/25/24
May well be strong enough for felony convictions.
-
Frank L
- 6:26pm 4/25/24
Like I said, good thing the Left lead with this one, their strongest case.
[NT]
-
NedoftheHill
- 6:35pm 4/25/24
They didn’t. SCOTUS and Judge Cannon made it the first one. Documents and Election Interference
-
Frank L
- 6:45pm 4/25/24
Not a strong case? Interesting.
-
NedoftheHill
- 7:44pm 4/25/24
It’s strong enough to convict. The other 2 are even stronger.
[NT]
-
Frank L
- 7:49pm 4/25/24
Are you as confident in that as you were in the pee-pee tape?
[NT]
-
NedoftheHill
- 10:33pm 4/25/24
Yes and still am. Your boy is a pervo on steroids
[NT]
-
Frank L
- 11:37pm 4/25/24
then the jury will be rewriting the law
[NT]
-
WestCoastIrishFan
- 6:28pm 4/25/24
You misspelled applying the law. If those entries were false and made to cover up hush money paid to
-
Frank L
- 6:30pm 4/25/24
how ironic it will be your profession that helps him get reelected
[NT]
-
WestCoastIrishFan
- 7:31pm 4/25/24
You misspelled convicted.
[NT]
-
Frank L
- 7:37pm 4/25/24
They should just charge election fraud. Simpler, right?
-
Iggle
- 7:11pm 4/25/24
Not unprovable at all.
-
Frank L
- 7:47pm 4/25/24
It's illegal to pay money for a non disclosure agreement?
-
Iggle
- 7:51pm 4/25/24
Except that’s not what he did.
-
Frank L
- 7:59pm 4/25/24
Illegal for someone to use their own money or their campaign's money to influence an election?
-
NedoftheHill
- 9:41pm 4/25/24
.
[NT]
-
Frank L
- 11:33pm 4/25/24
Yes, under the statute the way he did it was illegal and then booked fraudulently.
-
Frank L
- 11:32pm 4/25/24