That genetics influence antisocial behavior isn't in dispute scientically. Genes are passed down from parents. It's an entirely plausible hypothesis that some groups have, proportionally, passed down more genes that influence antisocial behavior. If you have a refutation of that that doesn't involve logical fallacies - "That sounds like the eugenicists of the early 1900s!" or "Environment plays by far the biggest role because I say it does!" or "You're a dogmatist, therefore your hypothesis must be wrong" or "You believe only black people display antisocial behavior" - I'm all ears. Where is the science behind your assertions? I gave you some of mine. The meta-analysis, I repeat, the meta-analysis, demonstrates that genetics plays possibly a 50/50 role in antisocial behavior, and the more violent the antisocial behavior, the more likely that genetics play a role. You've given me bupkis to refute that in the way of science. Go for it. Do you honestly believe that this genetic influence is distributed equally across groups? Seriously? Leave aside this issue. What is distributed equally among racial groups? Tell me. I'm dying to hear it.
Your fear and discomfort discussing this issue won't be settled by your name-calling and lying and fallacious arguing. You need to put something up.