Better than Baron's? No. Better than Ned's? No. Better than Cheeks? No. Better than Knute's, when he isn't making us laugh and is making a serious point. Certainly not. Better than conor's? Obviously. His idea of an "argument" is to make an assertion and then simply paste a link to NYT or WaPo. There used to be more lefties here who actually provided reasoned arguments. It's too bad.
This isn't hard to understand. Not all conjecture is made nor delivered equally.