Menu
UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting

UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting

UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting
  • Football
    • 2024 Notre Dame Football Schedule
    • 2024 Notre Dame Roster
    • 2024 Notre Dame Coaching Staff
    • Injury News & Updates
    • Notre Dame Football Depth Charts
    • Notre Dame Point Spreads & Betting Odds
    • Notre Dame Transfers
    • NFL Fighting Irish
    • Game Archive
    • Player Archive
    • Past Seasons & Results
  • Recruiting
    • Commits
    • News & Rumors
    • Class of 2018 Commit List
    • Class of 2019 Commit List
    • Class of 2020 Commit List
    • Class of 2021 Commit List
    • Archives
  • History
    • Notre Dame Bowl History
    • Notre Dame NFL Draft History
    • Notre Dame Football ESPN GameDay History
    • Notre Dame Heisman Trophy Winners
    • Notre Dame Football National Championships
    • Notre Dame Football Rivalries
    • Notre Dame Stadium
    • Touchdown Jesus
  • Basketball
  • Forums
    • Chat Room
    • Football Forum
    • Open Forum
    • Basketball Board
    • Ticket Exchange
  • Videos
    • Notre Dame Basketball Highlights
    • Notre Dame Football Highlights
    • Notre Dame Football Recruiting Highlights
    • Notre Dame Player Highlights
    • Hype Videos
  • Latest News
  • Gear
  • About
    • Advertise With Us
    • Contact Us
    • Our RSS Feeds
    • Community Rules
    • Privacy Policy
  • RSS
  • YouTube
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Home > Forums > The Open Forum
Login | Register

You inserted yourself into the ban conversation, so I asked your opinion on it. We agree. Thank you.

Author: NedoftheHill (44682 Posts - Joined: Jun 29, 2011)
Posted at 2:12 pm on Sep 5, 2024
View All

Regarding SCOTUS, we have impeachment for misbehavior. That is the only (or should be the only) control put on SCOTUS by another branch of government. If SCOTUS wants to enact a code of ethics for itself, then they should do so.

It is comical to think Congress might impose ethics obligations on SCOTUS such as no trading in stock of a company appearing before them, while Congress reserves the right to insider trade for itself.

Congress does have the power to increase and shrink the court at will, but that is a power that should not be exercised by either party. Once one uses it, the other will, too, and then we no longer have an independent judiciary branch of our government.


This message has been edited 2 time(s).

Evil preaches tolerance until it is dominant, then it tries to silence good.

Replies to: "You inserted yourself into the ban conversation, so I asked your opinion on it. We agree. Thank you."

  • Not sure why MAS...being a teacher...hasn't posted about the latest mass shooting in Georgia... [LINK] - TyroneIrish - 11:06pm 9/4/24 (29) [View All]
    • I think the more interesting question is why the FBI always has a file on these shooters but - Cole - 9:34am 9/5/24
      • Of course when they do something, they are violating someone’s rights for political reasons. [NT] - Frank L - 11:10am 9/5/24
      • You always need some distractions ready to go [NT] - holybull101 - 9:59am 9/5/24
      • All you have to do, Cole, is read the article...it appears "due process" was involved...unlike in - TyroneIrish - 9:58am 9/5/24
    • And then she can explain why she doesn’t want police officers in schools [NT] - WoodstockIrish - 9:18am 9/5/24
    • Acceptable casualties. Just more martyrs to the glorious second amendment. - Chris94 - 8:58am 9/5/24
      • Feel free to propose a workable solution to disarm civilians. - NedoftheHill - 11:14am 9/5/24
        • No need to disarm them. Target the ammo. - Chris94 - 11:42am 9/5/24
          • Yeah, that's working out great in Illinois. [NT] - iairishcheeks - 12:54pm 9/5/24
          • After ammo ban, are the deaths of innocent civilians by criminals "acceptable casualties" to you? - NedoftheHill - 12:40pm 9/5/24
            • Never said there should be a ban - Chris94 - 1:16pm 9/5/24
              • So, just make it expensive for the poor, but allow the rich to pay the tax? What types of ammo? - NedoftheHill - 1:24pm 9/5/24
                • Expensive for everyone. A massive federal tax. - Chris94 - 1:27pm 9/5/24
                  • Yes, people who are determined to commit mass murder are going to decide it's just too expensive. - iairishcheeks - 2:25pm 9/5/24
                  • Two possibilities: "Massive" means (1) effective ban; or, (2) rights are only for the rich. - NedoftheHill - 2:08pm 9/5/24
                    • If you're too poor to afford bulk supplies of ammo, then tough shit [NT] - Chris94 - 4:06pm 9/5/24
                      • How many rounds do you think come in a single box of AR ammo? - iairishcheeks - 5:00pm 9/5/24
                        • He doesn't know which end of a gun is the business end. But he's an expert on all things. [NT] - BaronVonZemo - 2:45pm 9/6/24
          • Would you ban all hunting ammo?...all self-defense ammo? SCOTUS wouldn't allow that... - NedoftheHill - 12:37pm 9/5/24
            • Chris, Frank didn't answer for you. Would still like to hear your opinion of a workable ammo ban. - NedoftheHill - 12:52pm 9/5/24
            • Uhm Ginni Thomas et al have already politicized it. [NT] - Frank L - 12:39pm 9/5/24
              • Not sure what you mean. Regardless, do you think a 100% ammo ban would be constitutional? - NedoftheHill - 12:40pm 9/5/24
                • Where have I advocated for such a ban and it wouldn’t be constitutional. I do advocate for a binding - Frank L - 1:42pm 9/5/24
                  • You inserted yourself into the ban conversation, so I asked your opinion on it. We agree. Thank you. - NedoftheHill - 2:12pm 9/5/24
                    • Huh? Do you understand Constitutional Law? Congress clearly has the right both to set the size of - Frank L - 4:36pm 9/5/24
    • Assault rifles have always been illegal. - PaND - 8:35am 9/5/24
    • Are black kids getting shot in urban areas “mass shootings?” - Curly1918 - 5:34am 9/5/24
    • Because the 14 year old shooter is white. - conorlarkin - 4:37am 9/5/24
      • Since there have been no photos of the shooter published yet, I just assumed he was Black? - Shadow_of_the_Dome - 8:50am 9/5/24
Close
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • RSS