You're the one trying to poke holes in the only empirical evidence offered in this entire thread, pedant. You tell me what percentage of the data is Kim Kardasian versus decoding of human, neanderthal, mammoth, flatworm DNA...versus data generated by particle collisions at CERN...versus information transmitted from the Cassini probe...versus design specifications for the Core i7 chip at Intel....etc etc etc.
And yes, I do believe they (and the thousands of graphs that look exactly like them) actually represent scientific advancement. Do you think they represent scientific regression?
This message has been edited 1 time(s).