Menu
UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting

UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting

UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting
  • Football
    • 2024 Notre Dame Football Schedule
    • 2024 Notre Dame Roster
    • 2024 Notre Dame Coaching Staff
    • Injury News & Updates
    • Notre Dame Football Depth Charts
    • Notre Dame Point Spreads & Betting Odds
    • Notre Dame Transfers
    • NFL Fighting Irish
    • Game Archive
    • Player Archive
    • Past Seasons & Results
  • Recruiting
    • Commits
    • News & Rumors
    • Class of 2018 Commit List
    • Class of 2019 Commit List
    • Class of 2020 Commit List
    • Class of 2021 Commit List
    • Archives
  • History
    • Notre Dame Bowl History
    • Notre Dame NFL Draft History
    • Notre Dame Football ESPN GameDay History
    • Notre Dame Heisman Trophy Winners
    • Notre Dame Football National Championships
    • Notre Dame Football Rivalries
    • Notre Dame Stadium
    • Touchdown Jesus
  • Basketball
  • Forums
    • Chat Room
    • Football Forum
    • Open Forum
    • Basketball Board
    • Ticket Exchange
  • Videos
    • Notre Dame Basketball Highlights
    • Notre Dame Football Highlights
    • Notre Dame Football Recruiting Highlights
    • Notre Dame Player Highlights
    • Hype Videos
  • Latest News
  • Gear
  • About
    • Advertise With Us
    • Contact Us
    • Our RSS Feeds
    • Community Rules
    • Privacy Policy
  • RSS
  • YouTube
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Home > Forums > The Open Forum
Login | Register

Not "Re-Imagined"...just better understood and applied...

Author: TyroneIrish (20688 Posts - Joined: Oct 8, 2020)
Posted at 1:54 pm on Sep 30, 2024
View All

...from the attached paper...
-----------------
Freedom of speech does not include the right:

To incite imminent lawless action.
Brandenburg v. Ohio, 395 U.S. 444 (1969).

To make or distribute obscene materials.
Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476 (1957).

To burn draft cards as an anti-war protest.
United States v. O’Brien, 391 U.S. 367 (1968).

To permit students to print articles in a school newspaper over the objections of the school administration.
Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier, 484 U.S. 260 (1988).

Of students to make an obscene speech at a school-sponsored event.
Bethel School District #43 v. Fraser, 478 U.S. 675 (1986).

Of students to advocate illegal drug use at a school-sponsored event.
Morse v. Frederick, __ U.S. __ (2007).

----------------

IMO government...through legislation...must act when there is the potential for serious harm to citizens...and restrict or penalize those who engage in such speech. Such decisions have been reached before...we can certainly apply lawful processes to deal with "Misinformation" as well.


Link: https://www.uscourts.gov/about-federal-courts/educational-resources/about-educational-outreach/activity-resources/what-does#:~:text=Freedom%20of%20speech%20does%20not,354%20U.S.%20476%20(1957).

This message has been edited 1 time(s).

Replies to: "Not "Re-Imagined"...just better understood and applied..."

  • D Kerry"1rst Amendment stands in way of Climate agenda&need Harris to win to implement change to it" [LINK] - BaronVonZemo - 8:57pm 9/29/24 (14) [View All]
    • Those pesky inalienable rights. Always a foil to the totalitarian Democrats. [NT] - LanceManion - 11:46am 9/30/24
      • Says the guy whose intent is to vote for a candidate who has said, he will be a dictator - jimbasil - 1:30pm 9/30/24
    • The left is telling us they want to limit the Bill of Rights. [LINK] - Iggle - 6:44am 9/30/24
    • They want to be able to lie with impunity, this is a real threat to democracy. [NT] - iairishcheeks - 12:22am 9/30/24
    • When FOX, with a market cap north of $18B can choose to shell out $787M for knowingly lying to its - TyroneIrish - 11:43pm 9/29/24
      • Are you suggesting the 1st Amendment should be "reimagined"? [NT] - MarkHarman - 10:04am 9/30/24
        • Not "Re-Imagined"...just better understood and applied... [LINK] - TyroneIrish - 1:54pm 9/30/24
          • Hard pass. You won't be getting legislation that allows you people to determine "misinformation." [NT] - jakers - 5:20pm 9/30/24
            • I just gave you a link with cases that thwarted different versions of "speech"...we can...and will.. - TyroneIrish - 6:49pm 9/30/24
        • Libel Laws have been on the books for a long time. Get with it. [NT] - jimbasil - 12:03pm 9/30/24
          • I completely agree and support them as such. - jakers - 12:25pm 9/30/24
            • Though I completely disagree with anyone who says the 1st amendment needs to go, I will - jimbasil - 1:10pm 9/30/24
    • What a piece of shit. - jakers - 9:37pm 9/29/24
    • She doesn't really believe in free speech. [NT] - NedoftheHill - 9:36pm 9/29/24
Close
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • RSS