You know this. It is inevitable. What is the difference between an Iranian airbase in Iran and an Iranian centrifuge in Iran? Here’s the difference, the latter target might set their nuclear program back. These strikes are going to occur. Why would we not be in favor (or at least neutral and silent) of a free chance at wrecking Iran’s nuclear program? It makes no sense.
Replies to: "They are going to hit targets in Iran, not Syria."
- When Israel responds to the Iranian attack, Sleepy doesn't want them to hit nuclear sites. Why? - Iggle - 7:32am 10/3/24
(9) [View All]
- Because escalation is not in the US interest [NT]
- Chris94 - 7:54am 10/3/24
- Now do Ukraine... Hahahahahahaha. [NT]
- iairishcheeks - 8:03am 10/3/24
- And escalation is not in our interest there too. - Chris94 - 8:18am 10/3/24
- That's a very selective usage of the term, I give you credit for creativity. [NT] - iairishcheeks - 8:23am 10/3/24
- And escalation is not in our interest there too. - Chris94 - 8:18am 10/3/24
- How is that an escalation? - Iggle - 7:58am 10/3/24
- How could it not to be considered an escalation? - Chris94 - 8:02am 10/3/24
- They are going to hit targets in Iran, not Syria. - Iggle - 8:16am 10/3/24
- Because it will not “wreck” their nuclear program - Chris94 - 8:27am 10/3/24
- Missile attack on Iranian airbase in Iran: not a declaration of war. - Iggle - 9:01am 10/3/24
- Because it will not “wreck” their nuclear program - Chris94 - 8:27am 10/3/24
- They are going to hit targets in Iran, not Syria. - Iggle - 8:16am 10/3/24
- How could it not to be considered an escalation? - Chris94 - 8:02am 10/3/24
- Now do Ukraine... Hahahahahahaha. [NT]
- iairishcheeks - 8:03am 10/3/24
- Because escalation is not in the US interest [NT]
- Chris94 - 7:54am 10/3/24