My understanding of ML is that you need a huge volume of data to succeed. While each individual genome contains 25,000 genes, the actual stack of decoded Neanderthal genomes is pretty small. So, the data seems to have a large surface area but is shallow. I wonder if the former allows them to get around the latter in ML?
Replies to: "That is interesting, thanks."
- Iggle, you may find this interesting regarding neanderthals. [LINK]
- iairishcheeks - 9:35am 11/14/24
(4) [View All]
- Oh, Neanderthals didn't go extinct. So, that's how they got that guy for the Geico commercial. [NT]
- Irishize - 10:58am 11/14/24
- Yes, and Fetterman. [NT] - iairishcheeks - 11:48am 11/14/24
- That is interesting, thanks. - Iggle - 10:20am 11/14/24
- That's kinda my take as well. [LINK] - iairishcheeks - 11:47am 11/14/24
- Oh, Neanderthals didn't go extinct. So, that's how they got that guy for the Geico commercial. [NT]
- Irishize - 10:58am 11/14/24