I understand that the market has slowly recovered to levels equivalent to 5 years ago, but on Jan 20th 2009 when Obama took office the Dow stood at about 8100, not the 6500 nadir of March 9th 2009. There was still a rise, and one can debate whether a true recovery was hindered or not by Obama's policies, but when you put out a graph where the starting point inappropriately makes the numbers look better than they are, it hurts your credibility. Yes, the image is factual, but no the image timeline does not fully and honestly reflect the DOW under Obama.
This message has been edited 1 time(s).