Unbeknownst to you, evidence is required to prove/disprove a lie...and I have it...you don't...

Author: TyroneIrish (17269 Posts - Joined: Oct 8, 2020)
Posted at 8:18 pm on Nov 22, 2024

...from the attached "Lawfare" (would you believe ;-)) article...here's an excerpt dealing with that "Individual-1" reference I made from SDNY Berman's book where Trump's AG
------------------
It was a puzzling thing to say. Comparable charges have been brought against people whose names are not Donald Trump. A similar—if weaker—case was brought against former vice presidential candidate John Edwards, and a factually identical case was brought against Michael Cohen, albeit in federal court. In fact, ever since the federal case against Cohen was brought, there had been a manifest injustice in the government’s failure to bring a corresponding case against Trump—or “Individual-1” as he was referred to in the government’s information filed alongside Cohen’s guilty plea. He was, after all, the person who, the government alleged, directed Cohen’s criminal actions and benefited from them. District Attorney Bragg’s indictment, in finally ending that unseemly asymmetry, might have been justified on those grounds alone. (My colleague, Quinta Jurecic, has laid out some thoughts about why federal prosecutors might have decided not to pursue Trump themselves on the hush-money charges.)
----------------

Again, I have evidence of what happened and it's corroborated by others...you have shown nothing to refute it...and certainly nothing to support a claim of lying on anyone's part...not Geoffrey Berman, the author of the Lawfare article...or me. You're a person who deals with data, Cheeks...why don't you employ it here?


Link: https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/was-d.a.-bragg-right-to-bring-the-new-york-charges-against-trump

Replies to: "Unbeknownst to you, evidence is required to prove/disprove a lie...and I have it...you don't..."