should I spell it out for them that I didn't invent the actual term or concept of "concrete thinking", but instead am linking it to a consistently reproduceable flaw in liberal psychopathology?
If the inability to understand is just The Grim Reaper bringing up the left side of the intellectual Bell Curve, I'd hate to hold them all down to the level of the slowest student.
And if I do have to give such an explanation, doesn't it stand as proof of the rule?
Or, is it not necessary since these rules are for others to help understand and assist with those dealing with the mental illness of liberalism?
What do you think?