Menu
UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting

UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting

UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting
  • Football
    • 2025 Notre Dame Football Schedule
    • 2024 Notre Dame Roster
    • 2025 Notre Dame Coaching Staff
    • Injury News & Updates
    • Notre Dame Football Depth Charts
    • Notre Dame Point Spreads & Betting Odds
    • Notre Dame Transfers
    • NFL Fighting Irish
    • Game Archive
    • Player Archive
    • Past Seasons & Results
  • Recruiting
    • Commits
    • News & Rumors
    • Class of 2018 Commit List
    • Class of 2019 Commit List
    • Class of 2020 Commit List
    • Class of 2021 Commit List
    • Archives
  • History
    • Notre Dame Bowl History
    • Notre Dame NFL Draft History
    • Notre Dame Football ESPN GameDay History
    • Notre Dame Heisman Trophy Winners
    • Notre Dame Football National Championships
    • Notre Dame Football Rivalries
    • Notre Dame Stadium
    • Touchdown Jesus
  • Basketball
  • Forums
    • Chat Room
    • Football Forum
    • Open Forum
    • Basketball Board
    • Ticket Exchange
  • Videos
    • Notre Dame Basketball Highlights
    • Notre Dame Football Highlights
    • Notre Dame Football Recruiting Highlights
    • Notre Dame Player Highlights
    • Hype Videos
  • Latest News
  • Gear
  • About
    • Advertise With Us
    • Contact Us
    • Our RSS Feeds
    • Community Rules
    • Privacy Policy
  • RSS
  • YouTube
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Home > Forums > The Open Forum
Login | Register
Upvote this post.
0
Downvote this post.

Ned, Does a new Rule of Liberalism #20 on concrete thinking require an explanation to libs?.....

Author: BaronVonZemo (61112 Posts - Joined: Nov 19, 2010)
Posted at 10:48 pm on Nov 25, 2024
View All

should I spell it out for them that I didn't invent the actual term or concept of "concrete thinking", but instead am linking it to a consistently reproduceable flaw in liberal psychopathology?
If the inability to understand is just The Grim Reaper bringing up the left side of the intellectual Bell Curve, I'd hate to hold them all down to the level of the slowest student.
And if I do have to give such an explanation, doesn't it stand as proof of the rule?

Or, is it not necessary since these rules are for others to help understand and assist with those dealing with the mental illness of liberalism?

What do you think?


Replies to: "Ned, Does a new Rule of Liberalism #20 on concrete thinking require an explanation to libs?....."

  • Ned, Does a new Rule of Liberalism #20 on concrete thinking require an explanation to libs?..... - BaronVonZemo - 10:48pm 11/25/24 (3) [View All]
    • Well, there is no helping Death. He will just use UHND.com as an opportunity for personal threats. - NedoftheHill - 11:22pm 11/25/24
      • No one was threatened, you're an idiot - Death - 11:41pm 11/25/24
        • High quality posting. Informative. Keep it up. [NT] - Cole - 3:32am 11/26/24
Close
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • RSS