UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting

Now we have from the very summary pages that you yourself reference:

Biden FBI - "We determined that three CHSs had been tasked by FBI field offices in the days leading up
to the January 6 Electoral Certification, with the required approval of the WFO, to travel to DC for the events
of January 6 to report on domestic terrorism subjects who were possibly attending the event.
also...
Biden FBI - "We determined that of the 26 CHSs who were in DC on January 6 in connection with the events of January 6,
4 entered the Capitol during the riot; an additional 13 entered the restricted area around the Capitol, which
was a security perimeter established in preparation for the January 6 Electoral Certification;"

We also have the following inexplicable "oversight" that once again (for the thousandth time) works in favor of the Biden Administration and against conservatives:

Biden FBI - "We determined that, despite some discussions about issuing a formal intelligence collection product specific to
both the January 6 Electoral Certification and the January 20 Inauguration, the FBI only issued an intelligence
collection product for the Inauguration.

....such a report would have made known the irregular presence of the FBI at the events which would have rained down fire of the Biden Adm at the time. It would have defused the political Jan6 bomb that was dropped on Trump/Republican opponents of Biden, and it also would have been able to be used by defendants in their criminal prosecution cases
(you ARE still a criminal defense lawyer, right?! You wouldn't want to know this for one of your clients?! Or does a client being a Republican change the calculus for you?

The rest of the report is just long thought over spin and rationalization.

The link below demonstrates where Wray wouldn't answer this question that he was required by law to answer to congress.


Link: https://thefederalist.com/2022/01/11/fbi-refuses-to-say-how-many-informants-were-involved-in-jan-6-violence/