and 53rd state?
1. Canada minus Quebec
2. Argentina
3. Cuba
Replies to: "What if we allowed countries to opt-in to the United States? Who would be your preferred 51st, 52nd"
- What if we allowed countries to opt-in to the United States? Who would be your preferred 51st, 52nd - Cole - 5:13am 12/19/24
(13) [View All]
- New thought: Ireland - poach them from the EU with lots of NIL incentives. [NT] - BaronVonZemo - 2:49pm 12/19/24
- No “shithole” nations allowed. [NT]
- Frank L - 9:32am 12/19/24
- Hey, agreed. Merry Christmas, Frank! [NT]
- Cole - 10:11am 12/19/24
- Back atcha. Have a great one! [NT] - Frank L - 12:13pm 12/19/24
- Hey, agreed. Merry Christmas, Frank! [NT]
- Cole - 10:11am 12/19/24
- the seychelles, tahiti, and thailand. [NT]
- und67 - 9:07am 12/19/24
- Done. If a country wants to save on defense spending, then it can offer to become a state. [NT] - Cole - 10:13am 12/19/24
- 1) Eastern California 2) Western New York, 3) Southern Illinois. [NT] - BaronVonZemo - 8:18am 12/19/24
- I’d prefer to split certain states into two separate states. - Curly1918 - 5:27am 12/19/24
- I’m sure you would, but not going to happen. If it does the Senate would need to be apportioned - Frank L - 9:33am 12/19/24
- It was just a hypo... but we did split Virgina and Dakota... albeit prior to their admission [NT]
- Curly1918 - 9:39am 12/19/24
- Virginia was split in 1863 because of the Civil War, not prior to admission. [NT] - Frank L - 5:16pm 12/19/24
- . [NT] - BaronVonZemo - 2:48pm 12/19/24
- It was just a hypo... but we did split Virgina and Dakota... albeit prior to their admission [NT]
- Curly1918 - 9:39am 12/19/24
- . [NT] - und67 - 9:05am 12/19/24
- I’m sure you would, but not going to happen. If it does the Senate would need to be apportioned - Frank L - 9:33am 12/19/24