I really find this amusing given that these same lib posters here have years of defense of the very thing the decry now in a different setting. Now they are strict constitutionalists again!
I know that they will claim that the SCOTUS upheld it as legal because Roberts viewed it as a tax despite Obama stating specifically on camera that it was not a tax, but they may also hold this up as well.
I have no doubt that they will sue it was ever the expected path.
This message has been edited 2 time(s).