in a different department if USAID is entirely eliminated..
This is a classic example of pointing to an actual function within a vastly corrupt operation in order to justify protecting the corruption.
Notice that Chris has not brought any criticism for the many abuses within USAID.
He merely tells us how amazing it is and that we can't live without it, yet we now have proof that it has been corrupted in so many, many ways.
If Chris were to be taken seriously, he would acknowledge problems and suggest solutions for purging the corruption but preserving the entity. Instead, he denies each example of corruption, and will continue to do so no matter how much evidence is brought forth (Rule #14).
This message has been edited 1 time(s).