…..and of course beyond his utter lack of credibility, there is the article itself which has nonscientific opinion pieces in its’ bibliography cited as scientific evidence as well (hilariously, a quarter of the referenced sources are from his own personal writings), and there as his false conclusions. Picking and choosing facts and events to support a chosen narrative is not scientific research.
The guy has a history of these claims as well as a history of having to retract them when receiving a letter from a lawyer.
I am not at all surprised that you believe in this type of pseudoscience…..you post it all of the time in your links. You may think it makes you look smart and gives your opinions legitimacy, but it does not. In fact, it simply reveals you.
I will not engage further with you in your tiresome propaganda schtick. I have shown here that the author who cites the threat of antivaxers has a past history of making false claims about antivaxers threatening him. He is not credible. Have at it.
PS - 0859 - done with editing for spellcheck changes and typing from my Apple
Link: https://sharylattkisson.com/2021/06/read-dr-peter-hotez-defamation/