See, this question is inevitably part of a tactic to defend "social justice."

| Register

See, this question is inevitably part of a tactic to defend "social justice."

Author: jakers (13588 Posts - Original UHND Member)

Posted at 11:09 am on Apr 4, 2025

View All

No one reasonable wants to see real injustice. The whole "woke" movement is so far beyond that. Sure, there's lip service to that stuff, but it's all about the victimhood industry and an attack on western values and capitalism.

This message has been edited 1 time(s).

Replies to: "See, this question is inevitably part of a tactic to defend "social justice.""

Personalities or policies? - Curly1918 - 5:13pm 4/2/25 (30) [View All]
- No excuses. Rationalizing your vote for Trump does not make it less disgusting or morally repulsive. [NT] - ND521 - 7:57pm 4/2/25
  - He’s psychologically guilt ridden. [NT] - Frank L - 8:06pm 4/2/25
    - He could argue that he voted for Trump in self-defense so Kam couldn't mutilate his family jewels. [NT] - ND521 - 8:30pm 4/2/25
- "Trump is the type of person you have to meet him to understand". [LINK] - Eli - 5:58pm 4/2/25
- Policies, eh? A little tariff perspective for you. [NT] [LINK] - Chris94 - 5:49pm 4/2/25
  - Where does it land off the chart? - wrdomerson - 5:59pm 4/2/25
  - I don't know how the tariffs will work out in the long run. If they bring jobs back, though... - NedoftheHill - 5:50pm 4/2/25
    - No. Inefficient industries shouldn’t be rescued. - Chris94 - 5:59pm 4/2/25
      - Of course, tariffs don't rescue industries, they rescue US companies and US jobs. - NedoftheHill - 8:03pm 4/2/25
      - I look at them as a sort of pre-war preparation and nation preservation. - NedoftheHill - 6:46pm 4/2/25
        Pre-war? I certainly hope that is not factoring in to official thinking - Chris94 - 7:12pm 4/2/25
        Being prepared for war is the best way to prevent war. You obviously know that. But, politics. - NedoftheHill - 7:59pm 4/2/25
      - Simpleton, you're leaving out a lot of confounding variables. - iairishcheeks - 6:27pm 4/2/25
        Free trade > managed trade [NT] - Chris94 - 7:13pm 4/2/25
        Which means no tariffs, right? - iairishcheeks - 7:56pm 4/2/25
        The system was not broken. [NT] - Chris94 - 8:44pm 4/2/25
        According to the working class, it was. [NT] - iairishcheeks - 9:34pm 4/2/25
- Can you explain the insanity of Woke? - Hibakusha - 5:19pm 4/2/25
  - See, this question is inevitably part of a tactic to defend "social justice." - jakers - 11:09am 4/4/25
  - I love this tactic. [NT] - MAS - 5:57pm 4/2/25
  - Supports racial discrimination, inequality, genital mutilation, end of women's sports... - NedoftheHill - 5:52pm 4/2/25
    - Since when is opposing White Supremacy a bad thing...or helping all people get a fair start in life [LINK] - TyroneIrish - 1:51pm 4/3/25
      - Did those "woke folks" advocate for able-bodied athletes to compete in the Special Olympics? [NT] - jakers - 11:07am 4/4/25
  - Here you go. - TampaIrish - 5:33pm 4/2/25
    - So social injusctice should be ignored? [NT] - Hibakusha - 5:36pm 4/2/25
      - A man in a dress should be. [NT] - PaND - 6:48pm 4/2/25
      - Nope. But it shouldn’t be used like it was the past 4 years. Social justice has its place - TampaIrish - 5:47pm 4/2/25
- Trump 2 is worse so far than the failed Trump 1 presidency. [NT] - ND521 - 5:18pm 4/2/25