That is some degree of anthropogenic global warming is real, and that the current scientific debate is which feedback loops have the capability of accelerating or slowing the process.
Keep in mind this is not what most people on the right think the debate is. This link has typical right-wing talking points on global warming. Typically it doesn't cede the basic fact that humans are increasing CO2, that CO2 is a greenhouse gas, or that the earth is warming at all.
One quibble I have is that 1 degree Celsius is no big deal. If it took thousands of years to warm 1 degree then it wouldn't be an issue. But a hundred years is a geologic blink of the eye, and we are seeing the effects, particularly on Greenland's glaciers (even if they are up from last year, on the whole they are way down). Also, even the most conservative model projects an increase of 2 degrees over the next one hundred years. The real scientific argument is will it be 2 degrees or 5? That's a pretty big difference. If everyone prescribed to the same "religion" wouldn't all climatologists predict 5 degrees?
But as long as misinformation like that I posted is disseminated, the debate won't be on scientific terms.
Link: http://townhall.com/columnists/johnhawkins/2014/02/18/5-scientific-reasons-that-global-warming-isnt-happening-n1796423/page/full