When they were part of the conspiracy to prevent a legitimate presidential candidate, yes. They can

| Register

When they were part of the conspiracy to prevent a legitimate presidential candidate, yes. They can

Author: LanceManion (7645 Posts - Joined: Jul 16, 2010)

Posted at 2:45 pm on May 7, 2025

View All

sue to appeal. I'm sure they have a decent chance of winning, although their behavior is tantamount to an insurrection, so maybe not. His argument has merit.

They all had the capacity to walk away from the sham charges. No lawyer is stuck with his or her client, especially if they are engaging in illegal behavior.

Imposing corporate abuse, neglect and greed on deserving victims.

Replies to: "When they were part of the conspiracy to prevent a legitimate presidential candidate, yes. They can"

To all you attorneys here - “well within the presidential scope”!? Do you believe this to be true? [LINK] - jimbasil - 12:28pm 5/7/25 (36) [View All]
- Mango is a mob boss and is operating like one here. The cowardly firms are only slightly less worse. [NT] - Frank L - 2:30pm 5/7/25
  - It’s interesting, 34 felony convictions, oodles of evidence and information and lawfare by D’s is - jimbasil - 5:21pm 5/7/25
- "Politics is a blood sport." Aneurin Bevan - Curly1918 - 1:12pm 5/7/25
  - He is an actual gangster. What’s your answer to my question below to Manion? [NT] - Frank L - 2:31pm 5/7/25
  - Not what was asked. [NT] - jimbasil - 1:22pm 5/7/25
    - Rhetorical questions do not seek answers. [NT] - Curly1918 - 1:27pm 5/7/25
      - Dumb [NT] - jimbasil - 1:31pm 5/7/25
- I’m sorry. I got 30 seconds in. Could that MFer speak any more slowly? [NT] - LanceManion - 12:55pm 5/7/25
  - Should the president be able to bar attorneys/law firms who have opposed him from appearing in - Frank L - 2:29pm 5/7/25
    - When they were part of the conspiracy to prevent a legitimate presidential candidate, yes. They can - LanceManion - 2:45pm 5/7/25
      - What conspiracy would that be and where is the charge and the conviction? [NT] - Frank L - 3:21pm 5/7/25
        Let me ask you, do Trump's actions extend to the CO attorneys who tried to get him off the ballot? [NT] - LanceManion - 3:25pm 5/7/25
        He committed sedition, he shouldn’t have been allowed to run - Death - 4:14pm 5/7/25
        Kinda my point about Colorado. No he didn't. And he let the Supreme Court take care of them. [NT] - LanceManion - 4:28pm 5/7/25
        Uhm yeah, and let the Courts and D boards take care of lawyers who are alleged to have been involved - Frank L - 5:54pm 5/7/25
        POTUS gotta protect the country. There are Democrat insurrectionists afoot. [NT] - LanceManion - 7:38pm 5/7/25
        Bwahahahaha. Protect the country! That’s a gas. [NT] - Frank L - 10:12pm 5/7/25
        
        Your denial is irrelevant. He organized and attempted a coup. - Death - 5:35pm 5/7/25
        You guys can rest easy. When the RIght stages a coup, they apparently don't bring any guns with them [NT] - NedoftheHill - 7:19pm 5/7/25
        Just pipe bombs. [NT] - Frank L - 10:16pm 5/7/25
        
        Not worth it, he will just keep on arguing his warped point of view. - PaND - 3:50pm 5/7/25
        Fair. This is one of those agree to disagree things I guess. [NT] - LanceManion - 3:58pm 5/7/25
        
        I don’t know but it doesn’t matter. You are a lawyer, yes? - Frank L - 3:33pm 5/7/25
        . [NT] - Frank L - 3:40pm 5/7/25
      - Ah a conspiracy! We should have known. It's the Stonecutters! - Chris94 - 2:49pm 5/7/25
        I enjoy a good conspiracy, although in this case, it's a fact. Sadly for the firms, they failed. - LanceManion - 2:53pm 5/7/25
        It's bullshit. But it's part of your new faith, so there is no point in discussing it. [NT] - Chris94 - 3:55pm 5/7/25
  - CBS seems to forget about the lawfare used against Trump. - PaND - 1:24pm 5/7/25
    - Define lawfare. - how about in your words. [NT] - jimbasil - 5:16pm 5/7/25
      - If they cared about lawfare so much, why wouldn’t they condemn Trump for it - Death - 5:40pm 5/7/25
    - Therein lies the problem. These aren't just firms that supported innocent clients; they fomented - LanceManion - 2:46pm 5/7/25
  - Coward! [NT] - jimbasil - 1:00pm 5/7/25
    - Posting something from 60 Minutes is the same as the NYT or WaPo. No credibility. [NT] - LanceManion - 2:47pm 5/7/25
      - Like I said, coward. [NT] - jimbasil - 5:14pm 5/7/25
      - Yet, you would post something from FNC? - Frank L - 3:41pm 5/7/25
        Whatevs. He won. There are consequences. Three years 8 months left, thankfully. [NT] - LanceManion - 4:30pm 5/7/25