I raced through it.
The legal defense is that the Racketeering charge is prosecutorial overreaching, whereby the Government is trying to bootstrap a rich guy who treats women as pleasure objects into a “criminal enterprise” because his staff lines up his fuckmates???? Negro, please!
It is not unlike the Georgia prosecutor indicting Trump et al for Racketeering re 2020 Election interference. Overreaching.
The factual defense is that Diddy might be guilty of misdemeanor violence at best, but that’s it. The women knew what they were signing up for — a fuck session with a wealthy super celebrity, hoping their skill set would be rewarded through a real relationship and/or a jet set lifestyle. They swung and missed, and now hope to profit via the victim card.
Link: https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/media/1368556/dl
Always best to start with the Indictment.
Replies to: "Always best to start with the Indictment."
- Honest question for conorlarkin: How would you defend Diddy if he was your client? - Hensou - 10:58am 5/15/25
(8) [View All]
- Defense wins championships! [NT] - conorlarkin - 11:04am 5/15/25
- Zealously, per 6th Amendment and per my oath. [NT]
- conorlarkin - 10:59am 5/15/25
- What strategies might you employ? Can you second-guess the defense so far? [NT]
- Hensou - 11:02am 5/15/25
- I know zilch about the case or the evidence. [NT]
- conorlarkin - 11:04am 5/15/25
- Get up to speed. You're opinion matters! - Hensou - 11:46am 5/15/25
- Always best to start with the Indictment. [LINK]
- conorlarkin - 1:08pm 5/15/25
- Makes sense. [NT] - jakers - 2:05pm 5/15/25
- I'm giving you a Yellow Card for F Bomb vulgarity. - Hensou - 1:23pm 5/15/25
- Always best to start with the Indictment. [LINK]
- conorlarkin - 1:08pm 5/15/25
- Get up to speed. You're opinion matters! - Hensou - 11:46am 5/15/25
- I know zilch about the case or the evidence. [NT]
- conorlarkin - 11:04am 5/15/25
- What strategies might you employ? Can you second-guess the defense so far? [NT]
- Hensou - 11:02am 5/15/25