Re: "false positive and potential harm," shouldn't a high psa be followed by biopsies or MRIs?

Home > Forums > The Open Forum

| Register

Re: "false positive and potential harm," shouldn't a high psa be followed by biopsies or MRIs?

Author: JarHead4ND (4250 Posts - Original UHND Member)

Posted at 7:35 pm on May 20, 2025

View All

(no message)

Link: https://www.health.harvard.edu/blog/new-study-once-again-casts-doubt-on-psa-screening-2018040613526

No more calls to Holly for kitchen clean-up. RIP old faithful companion.

Replies to: "Re: "false positive and potential harm," shouldn't a high psa be followed by biopsies or MRIs?"

"Why Biden may not have known about his aggressive prostate cancer until recently."... [LINK] - TyroneIrish - 2:03pm 5/20/25 (18) [View All]
- With the best medical care in the World? Ridiculous [NT] - lmcdonald - 10:46am 5/21/25
  - Nothing 'Ridiculous' about it...I've looked at the Mayo Clinic, Harvard, Stanford Medical websites - TyroneIrish - 11:55am 5/21/25
- I feel sorry for that old man who they used and took complete control over. Cancer in his bones now. - THEISMANCARR - 4:15pm 5/20/25
  - The facts tell a different story when it comes to JB's performance as President...because of his - TyroneIrish - 4:58pm 5/20/25
    - Well, that settles it. Biden was a perfect president and all Democrats are perfect people...again [NT] - MarkHarman - 7:25pm 5/20/25
      - Show us all where I called Biden, or all Democrats "Perfect"...that's a rhetorical question... - TyroneIrish - 7:35pm 5/20/25
- Like cheeks, I question the timing! The timing of this announcement is way too convenient. [NT] - Eli - 3:03pm 5/20/25
  - Why would you question the timing?...when would be a "Good Time" to make such an announcement?... - TyroneIrish - 3:33pm 5/20/25
    - Your favorite host from your favorite TV channel answered your question on timing. On PSA screening, [LINK] - Eli - 4:12pm 5/20/25
      - Your words, not mine...Brian Stelter is free to express his own suspicions as to why JB's cancer - TyroneIrish - 5:30pm 5/20/25
        The only person on this board who mentioned PSA before you is Conor. Why didn't you respond him? [LINK] - Eli - 6:04pm 5/20/25
        I've addressed your post about "Timing"...again, only JB knows why...anyone else is just uttering - TyroneIrish - 6:57pm 5/20/25
        Did I ask your post about "Timing"? No. It's you who asked me about timing. [LINK] - Eli - 9:04pm 5/20/25
        "Like cheeks, I question the timing!..."...your words...btw, have you registered as a Russian agent? - TyroneIrish - 9:48pm 5/20/25
        
        Re: "false positive and potential harm," shouldn't a high psa be followed by biopsies or MRIs? [NT] [LINK] - JarHead4ND - 7:35pm 5/20/25
        Don't lose sight of the context...my comment/link was in relation to those men over 70-75. - TyroneIrish - 7:50pm 5/20/25
- Why no one of objective mind believes him: [NT] [LINK] - iairishcheeks - 2:08pm 5/20/25
  - You must be talking about the Host of that Podcast ;-)...WOW! - TyroneIrish - 2:27pm 5/20/25