...now check t979 starting point...in less than 50 years, the rolling data average has risen over 1deg C...and at this recent rate it's definitely headed north of 2deg C...which is far higher than your paper's "findings".
It's time to stop betting on outlier losers, Mark...like Dr. Harvey Risch, who got derided by his peers and superiors at Yale, as well as his Co-Editors at the Publication that produced his original paper...and none of them have retracted their conclusions. Even Dr. Risch had to apologize for his sloppy work...as did at least two of the study authors he opined on.
Oh, and when the 96% 'Impact Factor' publication NEJM stands behind a Study showing 95% C.I....you end up looking like Jim Carey asking 'Mary' if he still has a chance of going out with her, when you bet on the 5% chance the findings are inaccurate...seriously...get real.