UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting

1) Conor specifically said that he would not follow THESE orders from the chain of command. If he were still active and did this, do you agree that he should be brought up for court martial?

2) Your answer implies that you need confirmation on your orders from above from a local federal judge. How on earth is that right or even practical? Are we paralyzed until you have been satisfied? What authority should a local federal judge have over the CIC wrt management of troops? Do you disobey the order if the local judge of opposite political persuasion blocks the POTUS order while the case is appealed to higher courts? (That delay could prove incredibly costly, and remember you are talking about doing this sort of thing when a Dem is POTUS and there are conservative military members as well).

3) The Left is showing how dangerous TDS really is. They are encouraging soldiers to make their own decisions based on their politics. It is absurd that they imply that Trump would make a morally ambiguous order but that "this one is ok". It's insulting and wrong.
An immoral order such as exterminating Jewish civilians is an obvious moral decision. Protecting citizens from violent invaders while allowing other branches of service (ICE) to enforce the laws of this land is not.
There was a recent election in which the immigration issue was the centerpiece issue. The American electorate indicated its' majority will. Any soldier who remains in the military must be willing to protect it's citizens and adhere to the law of the land.

Conor's view leads to chaos. The fact that he was a marine is an embarrassment to the branch.
I recall him spewing venom against Edward Snowden for his security breach, yet Snowden was making exactly the sort of personal value judgment as conor is making here...and Snowden wasn't even in the military. There is no moral ambiguity here.
This is the scene that Trump is sending troops into in order to protect our citizens. How the fuck (pardon my French) is this morally ambiguous?!

Addendum: I agreed with prosecuting Snowden, and i would most certainly agree with a court martial hearing for conor.