There are 2 choices. You would have me ignore fault of one but not of the other, like you do. Why not pay attention to both?
I wish one party was fiscally responsible, but when they aren't, why would I vote for the other fiscally unresponsible party? The issue becomes a non-voting issue. That is ordinary logic. How is that whataboutism?...please explain.
if both parties are the same on Issua A, and so I ignore Issue A as a voting issue, that is not justifying one party on Issue A with whatabourism. That is setting aside Issue A since there is no party championing it.
This message has been edited 1 time(s).