There is no specific crime called "collusion", you lose.

Home > Forums > The Open Forum

| Register

There is no specific crime called "collusion", you lose.

Author: iairishcheeks (27316 Posts - Original UHND Member)

Posted at 3:28 pm on Jul 10, 2025

View All

These things are true:
1. Russia attempted to interfere in the election with limited success.
2. Trump welcomed the help publicly.
3. Crimes were uncovered and prosecuted
4. The Trump campaign did not conspire or coordinate with Russia in their efforts. - this is what makes the claim of "Russian Collusion" bullshit.

Link: https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/07/12/what-is-collusion-215366#:~:text=Renato%20Mariotti%20is%20a%20former,those%20servers%20committed%20a%20crime.

Replies to: "There is no specific crime called "collusion", you lose."

Ten Truths that should be agreed upon by all. - iairishcheeks - 12:22pm 7/10/25 (29) [View All]
- My take... - TyroneIrish - 3:13pm 7/10/25
- Neutral? Bwahahahaha [NT] - Domer From Hell - 2:37pm 7/10/25
- Agreed. [NT] - PaND - 1:39pm 7/10/25
- 4 and 5 are not true. [NT] - Chris94 - 12:59pm 7/10/25
  - 7 is also a lie. Additionally while I think COVID was a lab leak there is no definitive proof. [NT] - Frank L - 6:41pm 7/10/25
  - On #5 [NT] [LINK] - iairishcheeks - 1:25pm 7/10/25
    - We’ve been through this many times. You can’t learn. [LINK] - Chris94 - 3:13pm 7/10/25
      - There is no specific crime called "collusion", you lose. [LINK] - iairishcheeks - 3:28pm 7/10/25
        Do you remember the timing of the WIkileaks release? - Chris94 - 4:58pm 7/10/25
        Why didn't Mueller charge them with the specific crime of collusion (that doesn't exist)? - iairishcheeks - 5:20pm 7/10/25
        Mueller was looking for chargeable offenses [LINK] - Chris94 - 6:34pm 7/10/25
        Did you even read your own link? - iairishcheeks - 6:45pm 7/10/25
  - On #4 [LINK] - iairishcheeks - 1:19pm 7/10/25
    - The NSA was not “spying.” There is no point in explaining it to you. [NT] - Chris94 - 3:14pm 7/10/25
      - I take the win by default. [NT] - iairishcheeks - 3:29pm 7/10/25
- And of course, #10 is wrong. [NT] - BaronVonZemo - 12:59pm 7/10/25
  - Huh? You really think the 2020 election was stolen? [NT] - Domer From Hell - 1:36pm 7/10/25
    - Of course he does. [NT] - Chris94 - 3:14pm 7/10/25
  - On #10 [NT] [LINK] - iairishcheeks - 1:26pm 7/10/25
    - The suspension of ID laws was the holy grail finally provided to Dems with prolonged COVID Shut Down - BaronVonZemo - 1:46pm 7/10/25
- #7 is 1/2 wrong. The COVID vax did prevent inf against strains was designed for at the time, BUT - BaronVonZemo - 12:55pm 7/10/25
  - The 87.4% effectiveness against infection was good, but the absolute declarations were false. [NT] - iairishcheeks - 1:23pm 7/10/25
    - Definitely so, as were the lies that it prevented spread. [NT] - BaronVonZemo - 1:35pm 7/10/25
      - It was in line with the clinical trials. Never tested against transmission. [NT] - iairishcheeks - 2:00pm 7/10/25
        Testing against spread was never part of the program...protection against Symptomatic Infection and [LINK] - TyroneIrish - 12:04am 7/11/25
        The problem here is that Biden and others told us it prevented transmission. You get that, right? [NT] - iairishcheeks - 4:21pm 7/11/25
        
        Correct, and without ever being tested, Fauci stated it prevented spread- hence the lie - BaronVonZemo - 2:17pm 7/10/25
        Agreed. [NT] - iairishcheeks - 2:31pm 7/10/25
- Pretty accurate, other than possibly number 9, as Mexico supplied much border patrol that somewhat - THEISMANCARR - 12:26pm 7/10/25