There is zero evidence anyone "colluded" with Russian hackers or WikiLeaks on the Podesta spearfishing operation that was a result of incompetence.
Manafort was essentially running a Hunter Biden scheme. Manafort was attempting to profit on his position in the campaign, everything he was charged with was related to this graft
"The Mueller report found that Manafort shared polling data with Kilimnik but couldn't definitively determine the purpose or what Kilimnik did with it, partly due to questions about Manafort's credibility. The Senate Intelligence Committee's report also stated Manafort sought to pass sensitive polling data and strategy to Kilimnik, identified as a Russian intelligence officer, but couldn't confirm the reason or what happened to the information. "
You're starting from a conclusion and trying to find supporting evidence, while ignoring or denying all other evidence. You even made up a "specific crime" which doesn't exist, but supports the bullshit that you really, really wish was true.
Why didn't Mueller charge them with the specific crime of collusion (that doesn't exist)?
Replies to: "Why didn't Mueller charge them with the specific crime of collusion (that doesn't exist)?"
- Ten Truths that should be agreed upon by all. - iairishcheeks - 12:22pm 7/10/25
(29) [View All]
- My take... - TyroneIrish - 3:13pm 7/10/25
- Neutral? Bwahahahaha [NT] - Domer From Hell - 2:37pm 7/10/25
- Agreed. [NT] - PaND - 1:39pm 7/10/25
- 4 and 5 are not true. [NT]
- Chris94 - 12:59pm 7/10/25
- 7 is also a lie. Additionally while I think COVID was a lab leak there is no definitive proof. [NT] - Frank L - 6:41pm 7/10/25
- On #5 [NT]
[LINK]
- iairishcheeks - 1:25pm 7/10/25
- We’ve been through this many times. You can’t learn. [LINK]
- Chris94 - 3:13pm 7/10/25
- There is no specific crime called "collusion", you lose. [LINK]
- iairishcheeks - 3:28pm 7/10/25
- Do you remember the timing of the WIkileaks release? - Chris94 - 4:58pm 7/10/25
- Why didn't Mueller charge them with the specific crime of collusion (that doesn't exist)? - iairishcheeks - 5:20pm 7/10/25
- Mueller was looking for chargeable offenses [LINK]
- Chris94 - 6:34pm 7/10/25
- Did you even read your own link? - iairishcheeks - 6:45pm 7/10/25
- Mueller was looking for chargeable offenses [LINK]
- Chris94 - 6:34pm 7/10/25
- Why didn't Mueller charge them with the specific crime of collusion (that doesn't exist)? - iairishcheeks - 5:20pm 7/10/25
- Do you remember the timing of the WIkileaks release? - Chris94 - 4:58pm 7/10/25
- There is no specific crime called "collusion", you lose. [LINK]
- iairishcheeks - 3:28pm 7/10/25
- We’ve been through this many times. You can’t learn. [LINK]
- Chris94 - 3:13pm 7/10/25
- On #4 [LINK]
- iairishcheeks - 1:19pm 7/10/25
- The NSA was not “spying.” There is no point in explaining it to you. [NT]
- Chris94 - 3:14pm 7/10/25
- I take the win by default. [NT] - iairishcheeks - 3:29pm 7/10/25
- The NSA was not “spying.” There is no point in explaining it to you. [NT]
- Chris94 - 3:14pm 7/10/25
- And of course, #10 is wrong. [NT]
- BaronVonZemo - 12:59pm 7/10/25
- Huh? You really think the 2020 election was stolen? [NT]
- Domer From Hell - 1:36pm 7/10/25
- Of course he does. [NT] - Chris94 - 3:14pm 7/10/25
- On #10 [NT]
[LINK]
- iairishcheeks - 1:26pm 7/10/25
- The suspension of ID laws was the holy grail finally provided to Dems with prolonged COVID Shut Down - BaronVonZemo - 1:46pm 7/10/25
- Huh? You really think the 2020 election was stolen? [NT]
- Domer From Hell - 1:36pm 7/10/25
- #7 is 1/2 wrong. The COVID vax did prevent inf against strains was designed for at the time, BUT - BaronVonZemo - 12:55pm 7/10/25
- The 87.4% effectiveness against infection was good, but the absolute declarations were false. [NT]
- iairishcheeks - 1:23pm 7/10/25
- Definitely so, as were the lies that it prevented spread. [NT]
- BaronVonZemo - 1:35pm 7/10/25
- It was in line with the clinical trials. Never tested against transmission. [NT]
- iairishcheeks - 2:00pm 7/10/25
- Testing against spread was never part of the program...protection against Symptomatic Infection and [LINK]
- TyroneIrish - 12:04am 7/11/25
- The problem here is that Biden and others told us it prevented transmission. You get that, right? [NT] - iairishcheeks - 4:21pm 7/11/25
- Correct, and without ever being tested, Fauci stated it prevented spread- hence the lie - BaronVonZemo - 2:17pm 7/10/25
- Agreed. [NT] - iairishcheeks - 2:31pm 7/10/25
- Testing against spread was never part of the program...protection against Symptomatic Infection and [LINK]
- TyroneIrish - 12:04am 7/11/25
- It was in line with the clinical trials. Never tested against transmission. [NT]
- iairishcheeks - 2:00pm 7/10/25
- Definitely so, as were the lies that it prevented spread. [NT]
- BaronVonZemo - 1:35pm 7/10/25
- The 87.4% effectiveness against infection was good, but the absolute declarations were false. [NT]
- iairishcheeks - 1:23pm 7/10/25
- Pretty accurate, other than possibly number 9, as Mexico supplied much border patrol that somewhat - THEISMANCARR - 12:26pm 7/10/25