Mueller was looking for chargeable offenses

Home > Forums > The Open Forum

| Register

Mueller was looking for chargeable offenses

Author: Chris94 (36784 Posts - Original UHND Member)

Posted at 6:34 pm on Jul 10, 2025

View All

All he found was extensive cooperation and obstruction.

Which is apparently cool with you.

Link: https://www.findlaw.com/criminal/criminal-charges/is-collusion-a-crime.html

Replies to: "Mueller was looking for chargeable offenses"

Ten Truths that should be agreed upon by all. - iairishcheeks - 12:22pm 7/10/25 (29) [View All]
- My take... - TyroneIrish - 3:13pm 7/10/25
- Neutral? Bwahahahaha [NT] - Domer From Hell - 2:37pm 7/10/25
- Agreed. [NT] - PaND - 1:39pm 7/10/25
- 4 and 5 are not true. [NT] - Chris94 - 12:59pm 7/10/25
  - 7 is also a lie. Additionally while I think COVID was a lab leak there is no definitive proof. [NT] - Frank L - 6:41pm 7/10/25
  - On #5 [NT] [LINK] - iairishcheeks - 1:25pm 7/10/25
    - We’ve been through this many times. You can’t learn. [LINK] - Chris94 - 3:13pm 7/10/25
      - There is no specific crime called "collusion", you lose. [LINK] - iairishcheeks - 3:28pm 7/10/25
        Do you remember the timing of the WIkileaks release? - Chris94 - 4:58pm 7/10/25
        Why didn't Mueller charge them with the specific crime of collusion (that doesn't exist)? - iairishcheeks - 5:20pm 7/10/25
        Mueller was looking for chargeable offenses [LINK] - Chris94 - 6:34pm 7/10/25
        Did you even read your own link? - iairishcheeks - 6:45pm 7/10/25
  - On #4 [LINK] - iairishcheeks - 1:19pm 7/10/25
    - The NSA was not “spying.” There is no point in explaining it to you. [NT] - Chris94 - 3:14pm 7/10/25
      - I take the win by default. [NT] - iairishcheeks - 3:29pm 7/10/25
- And of course, #10 is wrong. [NT] - BaronVonZemo - 12:59pm 7/10/25
  - Huh? You really think the 2020 election was stolen? [NT] - Domer From Hell - 1:36pm 7/10/25
    - Of course he does. [NT] - Chris94 - 3:14pm 7/10/25
  - On #10 [NT] [LINK] - iairishcheeks - 1:26pm 7/10/25
    - The suspension of ID laws was the holy grail finally provided to Dems with prolonged COVID Shut Down - BaronVonZemo - 1:46pm 7/10/25
- #7 is 1/2 wrong. The COVID vax did prevent inf against strains was designed for at the time, BUT - BaronVonZemo - 12:55pm 7/10/25
  - The 87.4% effectiveness against infection was good, but the absolute declarations were false. [NT] - iairishcheeks - 1:23pm 7/10/25
    - Definitely so, as were the lies that it prevented spread. [NT] - BaronVonZemo - 1:35pm 7/10/25
      - It was in line with the clinical trials. Never tested against transmission. [NT] - iairishcheeks - 2:00pm 7/10/25
        Testing against spread was never part of the program...protection against Symptomatic Infection and [LINK] - TyroneIrish - 12:04am 7/11/25
        The problem here is that Biden and others told us it prevented transmission. You get that, right? [NT] - iairishcheeks - 4:21pm 7/11/25
        
        Correct, and without ever being tested, Fauci stated it prevented spread- hence the lie - BaronVonZemo - 2:17pm 7/10/25
        Agreed. [NT] - iairishcheeks - 2:31pm 7/10/25
- Pretty accurate, other than possibly number 9, as Mexico supplied much border patrol that somewhat - THEISMANCARR - 12:26pm 7/10/25