From this new attack, we know with certainty that Dems were the Epstein clients because of Rule #1.

Author: BaronVonZemo (60206 Posts - Joined: Nov 19, 2010)
Posted at 3:50 pm on Jul 18, 2025

Trump said it's fake, and what the WSJ describes could have been created by anyone - including the Book Binder people who put it together or the SDNY who handled the evidence and who had many, many proven Trump haters who have already created charges out of thin air to attack him.

It says there is a "signature" of the name "Donald" around the pubic hair region of a hand drawn naked woman. Yet the WSJ does NOT claim that the signature was verified to be Trump's.

Seriously, you are a slow guy. By now, any wise person would begin to recognize the trademarks of another fake attack on Trump. The overly vulgar details also also a giveaway as the minds of the TDS crowd are themselves very vulgar and they project themselves into their attacks (remember the Pee Pee Tapes?)

Of course you will automatically believe any attack on Trump no matter how many times you have seen former accusations fall by the wayside.
I don't want to be defending Trump so reflexively, but it proves necessary with you hateful TDS'ers.

I'll be proven right again on this one too.


This message has been edited 3 time(s).

Replies to: "From this new attack, we know with certainty that Dems were the Epstein clients because of Rule #1."