....though I thought that this would be obvious:
During the Russian Collusion Crossfire Hurricane Operation as just one example, Dems trotted out John Brennan and James Clapper et who were Obama appointees who were claimed to be apolitical and above the fray.
94 said that they were "professionals" whose words on the matter were beyond reproach. When we conservatives pointed out that they were clearly involved in this attack against Trump, 94 doubled down.
We were told that those were professionals simply because of the positions that they managed to achieve, and that political subterfuge was not possible for these people.
But now we have the shoe on the other foot, and look who will not accept that very same "They are professionals" argument? That's right, the liberals who initially made it (Liberalism Rule #2 - The rules are for thee, and not me").
I posted this for two reasons:
1) I wanted to give libs a taste of their own medicine and watch how they would claim that this is "Totally Different" (Liberalism Rule #8).
2) I thought that the Labor Secretary's review of the election year irregularities with massive revisions after the fact that always helped the Dems from this Biden appointee was helpful.