It has always been, and will always be, "What he said (or she, when he links to Baby Doll's columns)."
A thinking person could logically wonder how anyone who cannot articulate and defend his ideas on his own can be said to truly believe what he says. The answer is that conor is interested solely in what is good for his political tribe. If tomorrow, the Democratic Party completely flipped its position on abortion (because, let's say, Trump flipped his), you can bet your last dollar that conor would begin repeating the justifications for this flip and linking to articles from liberals defending the flip, all while refusing to offer any logical argument from his own mind. In contrast, if the Republicans completely flipped their position on abortion, you wouldn't find a single anti-abortion person here flipping his position on the issue.
Replies to: "In all the years, I have never witnessed conor construct an argument for anything on his own."
- Indeed. Perfectly stated: [LINK]
- conorlarkin - 5:20pm 8/4/25
(24) [View All]
- every reference you cite has the word "opinion" in the site address. - und67 - 7:08pm 8/4/25
- Do you ever think for yourself? - Hensou - 5:27pm 8/4/25
- That would be much too mentally taxing. [NT] - BaronVonZemo - 8:31pm 8/4/25
- In all the years, I have never witnessed conor construct an argument for anything on his own. - MAS - 6:02pm 8/4/25
- Yes. Every post reflects my thoughts (and prayers). [NT]
- conorlarkin - 5:29pm 8/4/25
Seems like you are just rubber stamping NYT anti-Trump Op/Eds. [NT]
- Hensou - 5:33pm 8/4/25
- I also don't produce an exquisite Cabernet. But I appreciate its excellence. - conorlarkin - 5:42pm 8/4/25
- You saw my original response. It stands. [NT]
- Hensou - 6:56am 8/5/25