This is REAL WORLD DATA we're talking about...the exact same REAL WORD DATA your vaunted NEJM used to see what happened in Boston.
Face it. Because there is strong evidence that counters your belief system, you won't answer the question. And it's no wonder you refuse to read Dr. Risch's paper. You can criticize Baron's credentials of not being an infectious disease expert but you cannot do the same of Dr. Risch. He took the time - AFTER his colleagues criticized him - to thoroughly study all the data concerning HCQ+ (something your vaunted ID doctor didn't do) and came up with the only logical conclusion the studies show. And if you read his paper you would have no choice but to admit you and your hero the Great Fauchino were wrong. But since that would destroy your narrative - which to you is more important than the truth - you won't read it.